PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAS vs. MDST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAS vs. MDST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS) and Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF (MDST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CAS

1D
1.08%
1M
-11.07%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

MDST

1D
0.55%
1M
2.48%
6M
12.41%
YTD
18.37%
1Y
20.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$38.47K$52.48K$79.55K
$1.68M$1.58M$1.75M

CAS vs. MDST - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CAS and MDST is -0.35, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026

-0.35

CAS vs. MDST - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CAS
MDST

Financial Services

46.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

98.5%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

CAS
46.5%
MDST

-

Basic Materials

CAS

-

MDST

-

Communication Services

CAS

-

MDST

-

Consumer Cyclical

CAS

-

MDST

-

Consumer Defensive

CAS

-

MDST

-

Energy

CAS

-

MDST
98.5%

Healthcare

CAS

-

MDST

-

Industrials

CAS

-

MDST
0.8%

Real Estate

CAS

-

MDST

-

Technology

CAS

-

MDST

-

Utilities

CAS

-

MDST

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAS vs. MDST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CAS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


MDST
MDST Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
MDST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDST Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDST Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
MDST Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDST Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CAS vs. MDST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS) and Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF (MDST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CASMDSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.30

CAS vs. MDST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAS vs. MDST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAS drawdown since its inception was -15.89%, which is greater than MDST's maximum drawdown of -14.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAS and MDST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CASMDSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.89%

-14.19%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.28%

-1.87%

-12.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-2.17%

-4.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

Volatility

CAS vs. MDST - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CASMDSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.97%

12.69%

+21.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.97%

16.04%

+17.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.97%

16.04%

+17.93%

CAS vs. MDST - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAS has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than MDST's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAS vs. MDST - Dividend Comparison

CAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than MDST's 9.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
CAS
Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF
2.46%0.00%0.00%
MDST
Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF
9.20%10.22%6.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAS and MDST have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MDST is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MDST is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for CAS.

MDST has the higher dividend yield at 9.20%, compared with 2.46% for CAS.

CAS is categorized as China Equities, while MDST is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Westwood. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for CAS and 0.80% for MDST.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAS and MDST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer