CAS vs. MDST
CAS (Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF) and MDST (Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CAS is a China Equities fund actively managed by Simplify, while MDST is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Westwood. Both are actively managed. Their -0.35 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CAS charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for MDST.
Performance
CAS vs. MDST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CAS
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -11.07%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
MDST
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 2.48%
- 6M
- 12.41%
- YTD
- 18.37%
- 1Y
- 20.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $38.47K | $52.48K | $79.55K | |
| $1.68M | $1.58M | $1.75M |
CAS vs. MDST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CAS Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF | -11.11% |
MDST Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF | 1.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAS and MDST is -0.35, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | -0.35 |
CAS vs. MDST - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CAS
MDST
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
CAS
MDST
-
Basic Materials
CAS
-
MDST
-
Communication Services
CAS
-
MDST
-
Consumer Cyclical
CAS
-
MDST
-
Consumer Defensive
CAS
-
MDST
-
Energy
CAS
-
MDST
Healthcare
CAS
-
MDST
-
Industrials
CAS
-
MDST
Real Estate
CAS
-
MDST
-
Technology
CAS
-
MDST
-
Utilities
CAS
-
MDST
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAS vs. MDST — Risk / Return Rank
CAS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MDST
CAS vs. MDST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS) and Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF (MDST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAS | MDST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.95 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAS vs. MDST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAS drawdown since its inception was -15.89%, which is greater than MDST's maximum drawdown of -14.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAS and MDST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAS | MDST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.89% | -14.19% | -1.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.28% | -1.87% | -12.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -2.17% | -4.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.53% | — |
Volatility
CAS vs. MDST - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAS | MDST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.97% | 12.69% | +21.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.97% | 16.04% | +17.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.97% | 16.04% | +17.93% |
CAS vs. MDST - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAS has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than MDST's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAS vs. MDST - Dividend Comparison
CAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, less than MDST's 9.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CAS Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF | 2.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MDST Westwood Salient Enhanced Midstream Income ETF | 9.20% | 10.22% | 6.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAS and MDST have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MDST is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MDST is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for CAS.
MDST has the higher dividend yield at 9.20%, compared with 2.46% for CAS.
CAS is categorized as China Equities, while MDST is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Westwood. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for CAS and 0.80% for MDST.
Find the right allocation for CAS and MDST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer