CAS vs. DIV
CAS (Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF) and DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CAS is a China Equities fund actively managed by Simplify, while DIV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. CAS is actively managed, while DIV is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.34, they often move in opposite directions. CAS charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DIV.
Performance
CAS vs. DIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CAS
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- 2.69%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIV
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- 6M
- 12.73%
- YTD
- 15.27%
- 1Y
- 15.49%
- 3Y*
- 11.82%
- 5Y*
- 6.02%
- 10Y*
- 3.94%
CAS vs. DIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CAS Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF | -1.43% |
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 0.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAS and DIV is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | -0.34 |
CAS vs. DIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CAS
DIV
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
CAS
DIV
Basic Materials
CAS
-
DIV
Communication Services
CAS
-
DIV
Consumer Cyclical
CAS
-
DIV
Consumer Defensive
CAS
-
DIV
Energy
CAS
-
DIV
Healthcare
CAS
-
DIV
Industrials
CAS
-
DIV
Real Estate
CAS
-
DIV
Technology
CAS
-
DIV
-
Utilities
CAS
-
DIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAS vs. DIV — Risk / Return Rank
CAS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DIV
CAS vs. DIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAS | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.25 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.96 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.01 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAS vs. DIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAS drawdown since its inception was -7.26%, smaller than the maximum DIV drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAS and DIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAS | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.26% | -52.74% | +45.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.94% | -0.04% | -4.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.90% | -6.99% | +4.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.93% | — |
Volatility
CAS vs. DIV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAS | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.70% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.04% | 10.62% | +19.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.04% | 13.69% | +16.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.04% | 17.98% | +12.06% |
CAS vs. DIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAS has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than DIV's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAS vs. DIV - Dividend Comparison
CAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than DIV's 6.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAS Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 6.67% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAS and DIV have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DIV is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DIV is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for CAS.
DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.67%, compared with 0.36% for CAS.
CAS is categorized as China Equities, while DIV is Mid Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for CAS and 0.45% for DIV.
Find the right allocation for CAS and DIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer