PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CARY vs. UYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CARY vs. UYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY) and Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARY achieves a 1.74% return, which is significantly lower than UYLD's 1.91% return.


CARY

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.23%
YTD
1.74%
6M
2.13%
1Y
6.94%
3Y*
7.35%
5Y*
10Y*

UYLD

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.67%
YTD
1.91%
6M
2.37%
1Y
5.18%
3Y*
5.89%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CARY vs. UYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CARY
Angel Oak Income ETF
1.74%7.54%6.93%8.70%0.70%
UYLD
Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF
1.91%5.36%6.10%6.90%0.87%

Correlation

The correlation between CARY and UYLD is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2022

0.37

The correlation between CARY and UYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (3 years) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CARY vs. UYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CARY
CARY Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CARY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARY Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CARY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARY Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

UYLD
UYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
UYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
UYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
UYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
UYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CARY vs. UYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY) and Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CARYUYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-15.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.89

4.35

-2.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.45

38.06

-32.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.64

225.76

-202.12

CARY vs. UYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARY Sharpe Ratio is 3.96, which is lower than the UYLD Sharpe Ratio of 8.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARY and UYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CARYUYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.96

8.00

-4.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.65

5.98

-3.34

Drawdowns

CARY vs. UYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARY drawdown since its inception was -1.96%, which is greater than UYLD's maximum drawdown of -0.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARY and UYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CARYUYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.96%

-0.54%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.28%

-0.14%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.96%

-0.54%

-1.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.01%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.33%

-0.03%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.29%

0.02%

+0.27%

Volatility

CARY vs. UYLD - Volatility Comparison

Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY) has a higher volatility of 0.56% compared to Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD) at 0.38%. This indicates that CARY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CARYUYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.56%

0.38%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.30%

0.50%

+0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76%

0.65%

+1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.74%

1.00%

+1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.74%

1.00%

+1.74%

CARY vs. UYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CARY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than UYLD's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

CARY vs. UYLD - Dividend Comparison

CARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%, more than UYLD's 5.03% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CARY
Angel Oak Income ETF
5.93%6.13%6.10%6.38%0.48%
UYLD
Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF
5.03%5.07%4.97%5.92%0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


CARY and UYLD have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CARY has higher volatility (0.56%) compared to UYLD (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARY dropped -1.96% vs UYLD's -0.54%.

On 3-year performance, CARY leads with 7.35% vs 5.89% for UYLD. On fees, UYLD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, UYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CARY has performed better with a 7.35% return vs 5.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UYLD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for CARY.

CARY has the higher dividend yield at 5.93%, compared with 5.03% for UYLD.

CARY is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while UYLD is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for CARY and 0.29% for UYLD.

UYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.00 vs 3.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CARY and UYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer