CARY vs. TRBF

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CARY (Angel Oak Income ETF) and TRBF (Angel Oak Total Return ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CARY is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Angel Oak, while TRBF is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Angel Oak. Both are actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CARY charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for TRBF.

Performance

CARY vs. TRBF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY) and Angel Oak Total Return ETF (TRBF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARY achieves a 2.01% return, which is significantly higher than TRBF's 0.65% return.

CARY

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 2.01%
• 6M: 2.08%
• 1Y: 6.45%
• 3Y*: 7.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TRBF

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: 0.65%
• 6M: 0.64%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CARY vs. TRBF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CARY Angel Oak Income ETF	2.01%	1.35%
TRBF Angel Oak Total Return ETF	0.65%	0.94%

Correlation

The correlation between CARY and TRBF is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025	0.65

Return for Risk

CARY vs. TRBF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CARY

CARY Risk / Return Rank: 94
CARY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CARY Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
CARY Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CARY Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CARY Martin Ratio Rank: 92

TRBF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CARY vs. TRBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY) and Angel Oak Total Return ETF (TRBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CARY	TRBF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.59	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.60	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.79	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.07	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.83	—	—

Drawdowns

CARY vs. TRBF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARY drawdown since its inception was -1.96%, smaller than the maximum TRBF drawdown of -2.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARY and TRBF.

Drawdown Indicators

	CARY	TRBF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.96%	-2.59%	+0.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.28%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.19%	-1.35%	+1.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.32%	-0.83%	+0.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.30%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CARY	TRBF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.62%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.40%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.81%	3.74%	-1.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.73%	3.74%	-1.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.73%	3.74%	-1.01%

CARY vs. TRBF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CARY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than TRBF's 0.44% expense ratio.

Dividends

CARY vs. TRBF - Dividend Comparison

CARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, more than TRBF's 3.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CARY Angel Oak Income ETF	5.92%	6.13%	6.10%	6.38%	0.48%
TRBF Angel Oak Total Return ETF	3.14%	1.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CARY and TRBF in my portfolio?

CARY and TRBF have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CARY or TRBF?

On fees, TRBF is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CARY or TRBF?

TRBF is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for CARY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CARY or TRBF?

CARY has the higher dividend yield at 5.92%, compared with 3.14% for TRBF.

What is the main difference between CARY and TRBF?

CARY is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while TRBF is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for CARY and 0.44% for TRBF.