PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CARY vs. HFSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CARY vs. HFSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY) and Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CARY vs. HFSI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CARY
Angel Oak Income ETF
0.97%7.54%-0.74%
HFSI
Hartford Strategic Income ETF
-0.99%9.56%0.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARY achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly higher than HFSI's -0.99% return.


CARY

1D
0.36%
1M
-0.81%
YTD
0.97%
6M
2.36%
1Y
6.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HFSI

1D
0.35%
1M
-2.49%
YTD
-0.99%
6M
0.35%
1Y
6.27%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CARY vs. HFSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CARY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than HFSI's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CARY vs. HFSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CARY
CARY Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CARY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARY Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
CARY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARY Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

HFSI
HFSI Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
HFSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFSI Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
HFSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFSI Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CARY vs. HFSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY) and Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CARYHFSIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.09

1.47

+1.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.52

2.01

+2.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.29

+0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.08

1.78

+3.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.05

7.04

+12.01

CARY vs. HFSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARY Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is higher than the HFSI Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARY and HFSI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CARYHFSIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09

1.47

+1.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.83

0.45

+2.37

Correlation

The correlation between CARY and HFSI is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

CARY vs. HFSI - Dividend Comparison

CARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.07%, more than HFSI's 5.66% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
CARY
Angel Oak Income ETF
6.07%6.13%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HFSI
Hartford Strategic Income ETF
5.66%5.67%6.51%5.77%4.87%0.71%

Drawdowns

CARY vs. HFSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARY drawdown since its inception was -1.28%, smaller than the maximum HFSI drawdown of -19.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARY and HFSI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CARYHFSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.28%

-19.34%

+18.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.28%

-3.56%

+2.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-2.49%

+1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.22%

-5.91%

+5.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

0.90%

-0.56%

Volatility

CARY vs. HFSI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY) is 0.89%, while Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI) has a volatility of 1.61%. This indicates that CARY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CARYHFSIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

1.61%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.27%

2.37%

-1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05%

4.27%

-2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.18%

5.02%

-2.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.18%

5.02%

-2.84%