CARY vs. FAAR
CARY (Angel Oak Income ETF) and FAAR (First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CARY is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Angel Oak, while FAAR is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CARY returned 7.33%/yr vs 10.91%/yr for FAAR. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. CARY charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FAAR.
Performance
CARY vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CARY achieves a 2.01% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 20.23% return.
CARY
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 6.45%
- 3Y*
- 7.33%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FAAR
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -4.34%
- YTD
- 20.23%
- 6M
- 19.92%
- 1Y
- 26.86%
- 3Y*
- 10.91%
- 5Y*
- 7.89%
- 10Y*
- 4.79%
CARY vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARY Angel Oak Income ETF | 2.01% | 7.54% | 6.93% | 8.70% | 0.58% |
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 20.23% | 8.07% | 5.97% | -5.63% | -0.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between CARY and FAAR is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2022 | -0.10 |
The correlation between CARY and FAAR shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to -0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CARY vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank
CARY
FAAR
CARY vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CARY | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.79 | 1.35 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.07 | 4.75 | +0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.83 | 14.70 | +7.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CARY vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CARY drawdown since its inception was -1.96%, smaller than the maximum FAAR drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARY and FAAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CARY | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.96% | -18.03% | +16.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.28% | -5.68% | +4.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.96% | -11.54% | +9.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -5.43% | +5.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.32% | -7.82% | +7.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.30% | 1.89% | -1.59% |
Volatility
CARY vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY) is 0.62%, while First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) has a volatility of 2.47%. This indicates that CARY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CARY | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.62% | 2.47% | -1.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.40% | 9.68% | -8.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81% | 13.37% | -11.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.73% | 12.95% | -10.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.73% | 11.53% | -8.80% |
CARY vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
CARY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
CARY vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison
CARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, less than FAAR's 9.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARY Angel Oak Income ETF | 5.92% | 6.13% | 6.10% | 6.38% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 9.57% | 11.63% | 3.45% | 3.20% | 5.82% | 6.49% | 3.05% | 1.02% | 0.58% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CARY and FAAR have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FAAR has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to CARY (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARY dropped -1.96% vs FAAR's -18.03%.
On 3-year performance, FAAR leads with 10.91% vs 7.33% for CARY. On fees, CARY is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, CARY has been the lower-risk option at 0.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FAAR has performed better with a 10.91% return vs 7.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CARY is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.
FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.57%, compared with 5.92% for CARY.
CARY is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while FAAR is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Angel Oak and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for CARY and 0.95% for FAAR.
CARY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CARY and FAAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer