RBO.PA vs. CATG.PA
RBO.PA (Roche Bobois S.A.) and CATG.PA (SA Catana Group) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — RBO.PA in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances, CATG.PA in Recreational Vehicles. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RBO.PA vs. CATG.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RBO.PA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- YTD
- -19.55%
- 6M
- -28.29%
- 1Y
- -36.53%
- 3Y*
- -13.83%
- 5Y*
- 6.73%
- 10Y*
- —
CATG.PA
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RBO.PA vs. CATG.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBO.PA Roche Bobois S.A. | -19.55% | -16.18% | -25.43% | 56.98% | 1.42% | 95.23% | 12.00% | 2.75% | -13.50% |
CATG.PA SA Catana Group | 0.00% | -31.89% | -9.03% | -0.93% | -9.02% | 91.29% | -20.44% | 88.26% | -21.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between RBO.PA and CATG.PA is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2018 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RBO.PA vs. CATG.PA — Risk / Return Rank
RBO.PA
CATG.PA
RBO.PA vs. CATG.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roche Bobois S.A. (RBO.PA) and SA Catana Group (CATG.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RBO.PA | CATG.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.56 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RBO.PA | CATG.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | — | — |
Drawdowns
RBO.PA vs. CATG.PA - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBO.PA | CATG.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -54.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.28% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.54% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.18% | — | — |
Volatility
RBO.PA vs. CATG.PA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RBO.PA | CATG.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.90% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.14% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.62% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.99% | — | — |
Dividends
RBO.PA vs. CATG.PA - Dividend Comparison
RBO.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, while CATG.PA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CATG.PA SA Catana Group | 0.00% | 5.42% | 2.97% | 2.62% | 2.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RBO.PA Roche Bobois S.A. | 4.98% | 4.01% | 3.25% | 4.25% | 5.63% | 1.34% | 0.51% | 1.60% |
Financials
RBO.PA vs. CATG.PA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Roche Bobois S.A. and SA Catana Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
RBO.PA and CATG.PA have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for RBO.PA and CATG.PA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer