PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CARE vs. MMM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CARE vs. MMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carter Bankshares, Inc. (CARE) and 3M Company (MMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARE achieves a 52.54% return, which is significantly higher than MMM's -0.15% return. Over the past 10 years, CARE has outperformed MMM with an annualized return of 9.15%, while MMM has yielded a comparatively lower 4.58% annualized return.


CARE

1D
1.07%
1M
12.31%
YTD
52.54%
6M
50.09%
1Y
79.68%
3Y*
23.55%
5Y*
16.01%
10Y*
9.15%

MMM

1D
0.26%
1M
8.18%
YTD
-0.15%
6M
-5.36%
1Y
11.41%
3Y*
26.46%
5Y*
2.22%
10Y*
4.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CARE vs. MMM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CARE
Carter Bankshares, Inc.
52.54%11.77%17.50%-9.76%7.80%43.56%-54.48%58.13%-14.53%32.05%
MMM
3M Company
-0.15%26.36%46.13%-3.33%-29.63%4.85%2.77%-4.29%-16.90%34.90%

Correlation

The correlation between CARE and MMM is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2012

0.27

The correlation between CARE and MMM shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CARE:

$652.68M

MMM:

$84.35B

EPS

CARE:

$4.87

MMM:

$5.17

PE Ratio

CARE:

6.13

MMM:

30.65

PS Ratio

CARE:

2.07

MMM:

3.41

PB Ratio

CARE:

1.29

MMM:

25.85

Total Revenue (TTM)

CARE:

$319.93M

MMM:

$25.02B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CARE:

$256.97M

MMM:

$9.89B

EBITDA (TTM)

CARE:

$142.80M

MMM:

$5.28B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CARE vs. MMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CARE
CARE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CARE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
CARE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

MMM
MMM Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
MMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMM Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMM Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CARE vs. MMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carter Bankshares, Inc. (CARE) and 3M Company (MMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CAREMMMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.10

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.06

0.61

+4.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.55

1.35

+13.20

CARE vs. MMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARE Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is higher than the MMM Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARE and MMM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CARE vs. MMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARE drawdown since its inception was -73.17%, which is greater than MMM's maximum drawdown of -59.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARE and MMM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAREMMMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.17%

-59.10%

-14.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.83%

-18.77%

+2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.75%

-22.87%

-12.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.95%

-53.34%

+10.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.17%

-59.10%

-14.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-8.45%

+8.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.46%

-16.10%

-3.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.50%

8.48%

-2.98%

Volatility

CARE vs. MMM - Volatility Comparison

Carter Bankshares, Inc. (CARE) has a higher volatility of 8.65% compared to 3M Company (MMM) at 6.23%. This indicates that CARE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAREMMMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.65%

6.23%

+2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.11%

19.26%

-1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.45%

25.96%

+0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.05%

28.30%

+2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.81%

26.53%

+10.28%

Dividends

CARE vs. MMM - Dividend Comparison

CARE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than MMM's 1.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CARE
Carter Bankshares, Inc.
0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.26%2.96%
MMM
3M Company
1.91%1.82%16.27%5.49%4.97%3.33%3.36%3.26%2.86%2.00%2.49%2.72%

Financials

CARE vs. MMM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Carter Bankshares, Inc. and 3M Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
130.16M
6.03B
(CARE) Total Revenue
(MMM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CARE and MMM have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CARE has higher volatility (8.65%) compared to MMM (6.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARE dropped -73.17% vs MMM's -59.10%.

CARE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CARE and MMM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer