PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CARD vs. GGLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CARD vs. GGLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) and Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares (GGLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CARD vs. GGLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CARD
Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
27.01%-60.21%-58.19%-30.38%
GGLS
Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares
8.33%-42.64%-26.50%-13.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARD achieves a 27.01% return, which is significantly higher than GGLS's 8.33% return.


CARD

1D
-10.04%
1M
20.30%
YTD
27.01%
6M
23.34%
1Y
-54.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GGLS

1D
-5.18%
1M
8.01%
YTD
8.33%
6M
-16.79%
1Y
-48.64%
3Y*
-30.06%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CARD vs. GGLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CARD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than GGLS's 1.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CARD vs. GGLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CARD
CARD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CARD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARD Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CARD Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARD Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

GGLS
GGLS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
GGLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGLS Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
GGLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGLS Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CARD vs. GGLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) and Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares (GGLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CARDGGLSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.66

-1.60

+0.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.70

-2.49

+1.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

0.70

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

-0.82

+0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.85

-1.17

+0.32

CARD vs. GGLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARD Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is higher than the GGLS Sharpe Ratio of -1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARD and GGLS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CARDGGLSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.66

-1.60

+0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.62

-0.85

+0.22

Correlation

The correlation between CARD and GGLS is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CARD vs. GGLS - Dividend Comparison

CARD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GGLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%.


TTM2025202420232022
CARD
Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GGLS
Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares
3.90%4.87%4.31%5.80%0.20%

Drawdowns

CARD vs. GGLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARD drawdown since its inception was -93.51%, which is greater than GGLS's maximum drawdown of -77.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARD and GGLS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CARDGGLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.51%

-77.57%

-15.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-77.41%

-59.41%

-18.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.46%

-73.39%

-17.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.62%

-45.29%

-21.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

65.55%

41.49%

+24.06%

Volatility

CARD vs. GGLS - Volatility Comparison

Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) has a higher volatility of 25.18% compared to Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X Shares (GGLS) at 9.31%. This indicates that CARD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CARDGGLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.18%

9.31%

+15.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.70%

20.06%

+32.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

82.47%

30.49%

+51.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.97%

31.01%

+49.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

80.97%

31.01%

+49.96%