CARD vs. ELIS
CARD (Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and ELIS (Direxion Daily LLY Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds. CARD is passively managed, while ELIS is actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CARD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for ELIS.
Performance
CARD vs. ELIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CARD
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -13.67%
- YTD
- -2.60%
- 6M
- -2.07%
- 1Y
- -35.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ELIS
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CARD vs. ELIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -2.60% | -63.05% |
ELIS Direxion Daily LLY Bear 1X Shares | 11.37% | -29.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between CARD and ELIS is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CARD vs. ELIS — Risk / Return Rank
CARD
ELIS
CARD vs. ELIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) and Direxion Daily LLY Bear 1X Shares (ELIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CARD | ELIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CARD | ELIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.65 | — | — |
Drawdowns
CARD vs. ELIS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CARD | ELIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.68% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.13% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 33.93% | — | — |
Volatility
CARD vs. ELIS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CARD | ELIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.80% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.05% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.70% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.53% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 80.53% | — | — |
CARD vs. ELIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CARD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than ELIS's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
CARD vs. ELIS - Dividend Comparison
CARD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ELIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ELIS Direxion Daily LLY Bear 1X Shares | 5.26% | 5.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CARD and ELIS have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CARD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CARD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for ELIS.
ELIS has the higher dividend yield at 5.26%, compared with 0.00% for CARD.
They also come from different issuers: Max and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CARD and 0.97% for ELIS.
Find the right allocation for CARD and ELIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer