PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAPU.L vs. SRIU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAPU.L vs. SRIU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAPU.L achieves a -1.17% return, which is significantly lower than SRIU.L's 14.39% return.


CAPU.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.95%
YTD
-1.17%
6M
-0.95%
1Y
6.50%
3Y*
9.20%
5Y*
9.55%
10Y*
14.28%

SRIU.L

1D
0.59%
1M
9.88%
YTD
14.39%
6M
14.20%
1Y
27.88%
3Y*
17.30%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAPU.L vs. SRIU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CAPU.L
Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust
-1.17%1.73%17.90%21.81%-5.24%29.62%24.60%
SRIU.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
14.39%3.18%21.24%25.25%-15.68%31.46%-7.21%

Correlation

The correlation between CAPU.L and SRIU.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2020

0.65

The correlation between CAPU.L and SRIU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.72 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAPU.L vs. SRIU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAPU.L
CAPU.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
CAPU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAPU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAPU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
CAPU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAPU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

SRIU.L
SRIU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SRIU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRIU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRIU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SRIU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRIU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAPU.L vs. SRIU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CAPU.LSRIU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.42

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

2.89

-2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.51

9.38

-6.87

CAPU.L vs. SRIU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAPU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the SRIU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAPU.L and SRIU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CAPU.LSRIU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

2.31

-1.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.97

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.65

+0.24

Drawdowns

CAPU.L vs. SRIU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAPU.L drawdown since its inception was -26.39%, which is greater than SRIU.L's maximum drawdown of -24.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAPU.L and SRIU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAPU.LSRIU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.39%

-24.84%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.76%

-9.71%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.35%

-22.56%

+7.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.35%

-22.56%

+7.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.43%

0.00%

-5.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.57%

-6.46%

+2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

2.98%

-0.39%

Volatility

CAPU.L vs. SRIU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L) is 3.07%, while UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SRIU.L) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that CAPU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRIU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAPU.LSRIU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

3.98%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.04%

8.87%

-1.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.26%

12.22%

-2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.57%

17.44%

-3.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.60%

20.77%

-5.17%

CAPU.L vs. SRIU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAPU.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SRIU.L's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAPU.L vs. SRIU.L - Dividend Comparison

CAPU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SRIU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
CAPU.L
Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SRIU.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.70%0.98%0.51%0.94%1.08%0.80%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAPU.L and SRIU.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SRIU.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SRIU.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CAPU.L.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CAPU.L and 0.22% for SRIU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAPU.L and SRIU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer