PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAPU.L vs. L6EW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAPU.L vs. L6EW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L) and Ossiam Stoxx Europe 600 Equal Weight NR UCITS (L6EW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAPU.L achieves a -1.17% return, which is significantly lower than L6EW.L's 4.12% return. Over the past 10 years, CAPU.L has outperformed L6EW.L with an annualized return of 14.28%, while L6EW.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.45% annualized return.


CAPU.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.95%
YTD
-1.17%
6M
-0.95%
1Y
6.50%
3Y*
9.20%
5Y*
9.55%
10Y*
14.28%

L6EW.L

1D
-0.69%
1M
1.49%
YTD
4.12%
6M
7.14%
1Y
15.44%
3Y*
11.10%
5Y*
5.09%
10Y*
8.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAPU.L vs. L6EW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAPU.L
Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust
-1.17%1.73%17.90%21.81%-5.24%29.62%14.24%26.06%1.32%9.38%
L6EW.L
Ossiam Stoxx Europe 600 Equal Weight NR UCITS
4.12%23.27%-0.27%12.61%-13.76%13.55%7.30%21.13%-10.91%18.91%

Correlation

The correlation between CAPU.L and L6EW.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2015

0.66

The correlation between CAPU.L and L6EW.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (3 years) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAPU.L vs. L6EW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAPU.L
CAPU.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
CAPU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAPU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAPU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
CAPU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAPU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

L6EW.L
L6EW.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
L6EW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
L6EW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
L6EW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
L6EW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
L6EW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAPU.L vs. L6EW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L) and Ossiam Stoxx Europe 600 Equal Weight NR UCITS (L6EW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CAPU.LL6EW.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.23

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

1.35

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.51

4.80

-2.30

CAPU.L vs. L6EW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAPU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the L6EW.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAPU.L and L6EW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CAPU.LL6EW.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

1.25

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.33

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.54

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.60

+0.29

Drawdowns

CAPU.L vs. L6EW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAPU.L drawdown since its inception was -26.39%, smaller than the maximum L6EW.L drawdown of -30.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAPU.L and L6EW.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAPU.LL6EW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.39%

-30.88%

+4.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.76%

-11.43%

+3.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.35%

-12.28%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.35%

-26.62%

+11.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.39%

-30.88%

+4.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.43%

-2.45%

-2.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.57%

-5.51%

+1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

3.21%

-0.62%

Volatility

CAPU.L vs. L6EW.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L) is 3.07%, while Ossiam Stoxx Europe 600 Equal Weight NR UCITS (L6EW.L) has a volatility of 4.03%. This indicates that CAPU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than L6EW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAPU.LL6EW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

4.03%

-0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.04%

10.32%

-3.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.26%

12.35%

-3.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.57%

15.24%

-1.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.60%

15.61%

-0.01%

CAPU.L vs. L6EW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAPU.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than L6EW.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAPU.L vs. L6EW.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CAPU.L nor L6EW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CAPU.L and L6EW.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, L6EW.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

L6EW.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CAPU.L.

CAPU.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while L6EW.L is Europe Equities. CAPU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while L6EW.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CAPU.L and 0.35% for L6EW.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAPU.L and L6EW.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer