PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAOS vs. JULQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CAOS vs. JULQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CAOS vs. JULQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


CAOS

1D
0.07%
1M
0.43%
YTD
1.10%
6M
1.37%
1Y
3.19%
3Y*
5.46%
5Y*
10Y*

JULQ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CAOS vs. JULQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAOS has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than JULQ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CAOS vs. JULQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAOS
CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

JULQ
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAOS vs. JULQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - July (JULQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CAOSJULQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.97

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.38

CAOS vs. JULQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CAOSJULQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.27

Dividends

CAOS vs. JULQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither CAOS nor JULQ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CAOS vs. JULQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAOS drawdown since its inception was -3.60%, which is greater than JULQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAOS and JULQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CAOSJULQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.60%

0.00%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

0.00%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.90%

0.00%

-0.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

Volatility

CAOS vs. JULQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CAOSJULQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.68%

0.00%

+4.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.37%

0.00%

+4.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.37%

0.00%

+4.37%