PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAOS vs. AVDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAOS vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAOS achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly lower than AVDV's 13.22% return.


CAOS

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
0.81%
6M
0.65%
1Y
1.88%
3Y*
4.15%
5Y*
10Y*

AVDV

1D
0.26%
1M
-2.93%
YTD
13.22%
6M
16.29%
1Y
40.16%
3Y*
26.61%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAOS vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CAOS
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
0.81%2.55%5.33%7.97%
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
13.22%49.37%8.67%8.19%

Correlation

The correlation between CAOS and AVDV is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2023

0.06

The correlation between CAOS and AVDV shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CAOS vs. AVDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CAOS
AVDV

Technology

33.1%
6.4%

Financial Services

12.4%
13.7%

Communication Services

10.4%
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
14.4%

Healthcare

9.6%
2.1%

Industrials

8.5%
21.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
3.4%

Energy

4.1%
10.8%

Utilities

2.6%
1.7%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.1%

Basic Materials

1.9%
22.5%

Technology

CAOS
33.1%
AVDV
6.4%

Financial Services

CAOS
12.4%
AVDV
13.7%

Communication Services

CAOS
10.4%
AVDV
2.0%

Consumer Cyclical

CAOS
10.0%
AVDV
14.4%

Healthcare

CAOS
9.6%
AVDV
2.1%

Industrials

CAOS
8.5%
AVDV
21.3%

Consumer Defensive

CAOS
5.4%
AVDV
3.4%

Energy

CAOS
4.1%
AVDV
10.8%

Utilities

CAOS
2.6%
AVDV
1.7%

Real Estate

CAOS
2.0%
AVDV
1.1%

Basic Materials

CAOS
1.9%
AVDV
22.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAOS vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAOS
CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

AVDV
AVDV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
AVDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AVDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAOS vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CAOSAVDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.46

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

3.06

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.17

12.34

-6.18

CAOS vs. AVDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAOS Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the AVDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAOS and AVDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CAOSAVDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

2.54

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

0.78

+0.43

Drawdowns

CAOS vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAOS drawdown since its inception was -3.60%, smaller than the maximum AVDV drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAOS and AVDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAOSAVDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.60%

-43.01%

+39.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.76%

-13.19%

+12.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.60%

-14.17%

+10.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-3.74%

+2.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.90%

-6.77%

+5.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.31%

3.26%

-2.95%

Volatility

CAOS vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) is 0.29%, while Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that CAOS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAOSAVDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.29%

5.49%

-5.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.04%

13.49%

-12.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53%

15.92%

-14.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.25%

17.35%

-13.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.25%

19.75%

-15.50%

CAOS vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAOS has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAOS vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison

CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
2.81%3.05%4.31%3.29%3.17%2.39%1.67%0.36%
CAOS
Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAOS and AVDV have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVDV has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to CAOS (0.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAOS dropped -3.60% vs AVDV's -43.01%.

On 3-year performance, AVDV leads with 26.61% vs 4.15% for CAOS. On fees, AVDV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, CAOS has been the lower-risk option at 0.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 26.61% return vs 4.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVDV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CAOS.

AVDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.

CAOS is categorized as Options Trading, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for CAOS and 0.36% for AVDV.

AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAOS and AVDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer