PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAMX vs. VMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAMX vs. VMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) and Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAMX achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly lower than VMAX's 15.44% return.


CAMX

1D
-0.40%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
8.45%
6M
8.00%
1Y
13.72%
3Y*
13.67%
5Y*
10Y*

VMAX

1D
-0.08%
1M
3.05%
YTD
15.44%
6M
14.38%
1Y
29.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAMX vs. VMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CAMX
Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF
8.45%9.49%12.50%5.64%
VMAX
Hartford US Value ETF
15.44%15.65%15.89%5.71%

Correlation

The correlation between CAMX and VMAX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023

0.83

The correlation between CAMX and VMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

CAMX vs. VMAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CAMX
VMAX

Industrials

26.4%
5.5%

Healthcare

22.4%
11.1%

Communication Services

13.5%
6.6%

Technology

10.4%
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
3.7%

Energy

6.2%
11.0%

Financial Services

5.3%
32.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
3.7%

Basic Materials

4.2%
2.8%

Real Estate

-

4.4%

Utilities

-

5.3%

Industrials

CAMX
26.4%
VMAX
5.5%

Healthcare

CAMX
22.4%
VMAX
11.1%

Communication Services

CAMX
13.5%
VMAX
6.6%

Technology

CAMX
10.4%
VMAX
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

CAMX
7.1%
VMAX
3.7%

Energy

CAMX
6.2%
VMAX
11.0%

Financial Services

CAMX
5.3%
VMAX
32.4%

Consumer Defensive

CAMX
4.5%
VMAX
3.7%

Basic Materials

CAMX
4.2%
VMAX
2.8%

Real Estate

CAMX

-

VMAX
4.4%

Utilities

CAMX

-

VMAX
5.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAMX vs. VMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAMX
CAMX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
CAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

VMAX
VMAX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAMX vs. VMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) and Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CAMXVMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.42

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

6.04

-4.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.82

21.18

-17.36

CAMX vs. VMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the VMAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAMX and VMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAMX vs. VMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAMX drawdown since its inception was -15.71%, smaller than the maximum VMAX drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAMX and VMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAMXVMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.71%

-19.05%

+3.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.79%

-4.93%

-6.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-0.39%

-1.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.73%

-2.52%

-0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

1.40%

+2.20%

Volatility

CAMX vs. VMAX - Volatility Comparison

Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to Hartford US Value ETF (VMAX) at 3.17%. This indicates that CAMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAMXVMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.29%

3.17%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.92%

8.83%

+2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.05%

12.31%

+1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.50%

15.41%

-0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.50%

15.41%

-0.91%

CAMX vs. VMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAMX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VMAX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAMX vs. VMAX - Dividend Comparison

CAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than VMAX's 1.85% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CAMX
Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF
1.67%1.81%1.33%0.55%
VMAX
Hartford US Value ETF
1.85%2.14%1.95%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAMX and VMAX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAMX has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to VMAX (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAMX dropped -15.71% vs VMAX's -19.05%.

On 1-year performance, VMAX leads with 29.63% vs 13.72% for CAMX. On fees, VMAX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, VMAX has been the lower-risk option at 3.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VMAX has performed better with a 29.63% return vs 13.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VMAX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CAMX.

VMAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 1.67% for CAMX.

They also come from different issuers: Cambiar Funds and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CAMX and 0.29% for VMAX.

VMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAMX and VMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer