CAMX vs. LSVD
CAMX (Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF) and LSVD (LSV Disciplined Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CAMX returned 15.32% vs 43.26% for LSVD. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CAMX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LSVD.
Performance
CAMX vs. LSVD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAMX achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly lower than LSVD's 17.67% return.
CAMX
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 8.60%
- 6M
- 8.13%
- 1Y
- 15.32%
- 3Y*
- 13.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LSVD
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 7.12%
- YTD
- 17.67%
- 6M
- 18.95%
- 1Y
- 43.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAMX vs. LSVD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CAMX Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF | 8.60% | 9.49% | 0.43% |
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF | 17.67% | 22.29% | 0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAMX and LSVD is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | 0.76 |
The correlation between CAMX and LSVD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
CAMX vs. LSVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CAMX
LSVD
Healthcare
Industrials
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
CAMX
LSVD
Industrials
CAMX
LSVD
Technology
CAMX
LSVD
Communication Services
CAMX
LSVD
Consumer Defensive
CAMX
LSVD
Energy
CAMX
LSVD
Consumer Cyclical
CAMX
LSVD
Financial Services
CAMX
LSVD
Basic Materials
CAMX
LSVD
Real Estate
CAMX
-
LSVD
Utilities
CAMX
-
LSVD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAMX vs. LSVD — Risk / Return Rank
CAMX
LSVD
CAMX vs. LSVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) and LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CAMX | LSVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.61 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 5.38 | -4.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.26 | 24.69 | -20.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAMX | LSVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | 3.41 | -2.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 1.66 | -0.80 |
Drawdowns
CAMX vs. LSVD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAMX drawdown since its inception was -15.71%, smaller than the maximum LSVD drawdown of -19.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAMX and LSVD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAMX | LSVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.71% | -19.30% | +3.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.79% | -8.07% | -3.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -0.53% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.76% | -2.47% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 1.76% | +1.84% |
Volatility
CAMX vs. LSVD - Volatility Comparison
Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) at 3.36%. This indicates that CAMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAMX | LSVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | 3.36% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.46% | 9.52% | +0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.80% | 12.76% | +1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.45% | 17.45% | -3.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.45% | 17.45% | -3.00% |
CAMX vs. LSVD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAMX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than LSVD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAMX vs. LSVD - Dividend Comparison
CAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than LSVD's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CAMX Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF | 1.67% | 1.81% | 1.33% | 0.55% |
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF | 0.27% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAMX and LSVD have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAMX has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to LSVD (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAMX dropped -15.71% vs LSVD's -19.30%.
On 1-year performance, LSVD leads with 43.26% vs 15.32% for CAMX. On fees, LSVD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, LSVD has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LSVD has performed better with a 43.26% return vs 15.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LSVD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CAMX.
CAMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.27% for LSVD.
They also come from different issuers: Cambiar Funds and LSV. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CAMX and 0.40% for LSVD.
LSVD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CAMX and LSVD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer