PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAMMX vs. BTMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAMMX vs. BTMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambiar SMID Fund (CAMMX) and Boston Trust Midcap Fund (BTMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAMMX achieves a 14.35% return, which is significantly higher than BTMFX's 1.92% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CAMMX having a 10.15% annualized return and BTMFX not far behind at 10.08%.


CAMMX

1D
0.84%
1M
4.08%
YTD
14.35%
6M
12.98%
1Y
18.62%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
3.64%
10Y*
10.15%

BTMFX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.74%
YTD
1.92%
6M
1.46%
1Y
5.64%
3Y*
9.29%
5Y*
5.63%
10Y*
10.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAMMX vs. BTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAMMX
Cambiar SMID Fund
14.35%0.08%-1.42%12.93%-6.07%23.32%9.60%31.00%-2.68%11.77%
BTMFX
Boston Trust Midcap Fund
1.92%4.29%10.27%13.06%-10.91%24.77%9.72%33.00%-3.36%20.01%

Correlation

The correlation between CAMMX and BTMFX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2011

0.91

The correlation between CAMMX and BTMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAMMX vs. BTMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAMMX
CAMMX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CAMMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAMMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAMMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
CAMMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAMMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

BTMFX
BTMFX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
BTMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
BTMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAMMX vs. BTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambiar SMID Fund (CAMMX) and Boston Trust Midcap Fund (BTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CAMMXBTMFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.10

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

0.84

+1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.77

2.35

+3.42

CAMMX vs. BTMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAMMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the BTMFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAMMX and BTMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CAMMXBTMFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

0.56

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.36

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.58

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.48

+0.01

Drawdowns

CAMMX vs. BTMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAMMX drawdown since its inception was -41.94%, smaller than the maximum BTMFX drawdown of -49.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAMMX and BTMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAMMXBTMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.94%

-49.26%

+7.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.49%

-7.79%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.75%

-17.77%

-3.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.75%

-20.79%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.94%

-37.14%

-4.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-2.54%

+1.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.97%

-6.16%

+0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

2.80%

+0.67%

Volatility

CAMMX vs. BTMFX - Volatility Comparison

Cambiar SMID Fund (CAMMX) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to Boston Trust Midcap Fund (BTMFX) at 2.88%. This indicates that CAMMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAMMXBTMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

2.88%

+1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.58%

7.99%

+2.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.02%

11.80%

+3.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.00%

15.75%

+1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.81%

17.44%

+1.37%

CAMMX vs. BTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAMMX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than BTMFX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAMMX vs. BTMFX - Dividend Comparison

CAMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.21%, more than BTMFX's 10.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTMFX
Boston Trust Midcap Fund
10.66%10.86%4.23%4.41%4.71%4.91%1.98%6.95%5.96%6.61%7.03%6.60%
CAMMX
Cambiar SMID Fund
30.21%34.55%6.10%0.70%0.95%11.52%0.61%4.08%6.83%0.39%0.53%0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAMMX and BTMFX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAMMX has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to BTMFX (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAMMX dropped -41.94% vs BTMFX's -49.26%.

CAMMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAMMX and BTMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer