CAM vs. OVM
CAM (AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF) and OVM (Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CAM charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for OVM.
Performance
CAM vs. OVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAM achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly lower than OVM's 3.96% return.
CAM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OVM
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 3.96%
- 6M
- 4.16%
- 1Y
- 11.81%
- 3Y*
- 5.37%
- 5Y*
- 1.59%
- 10Y*
- —
CAM vs. OVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CAM AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF | 1.29% | 1.17% |
OVM Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF | 3.96% | 1.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAM and OVM is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAM vs. OVM — Risk / Return Rank
CAM
OVM
CAM vs. OVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF (CAM) and Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAM | OVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.80 | 0.43 | +1.37 |
Drawdowns
CAM vs. OVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAM drawdown since its inception was -2.19%, smaller than the maximum OVM drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAM and OVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAM | OVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.19% | -15.58% | +13.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -0.17% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.51% | -4.01% | +3.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.63% | — |
Volatility
CAM vs. OVM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAM | OVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.36% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12% | 4.16% | -2.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.12% | 5.39% | -3.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.12% | 6.55% | -4.43% |
CAM vs. OVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAM has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than OVM's 0.82% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAM vs. OVM - Dividend Comparison
CAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than OVM's 6.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAM AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF | 2.25% | 0.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OVM Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF | 6.11% | 5.45% | 4.91% | 4.66% | 4.21% | 6.10% | 3.97% | 0.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAM and OVM have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CAM is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CAM is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for OVM.
OVM has the higher dividend yield at 6.11%, compared with 2.25% for CAM.
They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and Liquid Strategies. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for CAM and 0.82% for OVM.
Find the right allocation for CAM and OVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer