CAM vs. AUSM
CAM (AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF) and AUSM (Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CAM charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for AUSM.
Performance
CAM vs. AUSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAM achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly higher than AUSM's 0.98% return.
CAM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AUSM
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 0.98%
- 6M
- 1.34%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAM vs. AUSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CAM AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF | 1.29% | 1.17% |
AUSM Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF | 0.98% | 0.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAM and AUSM is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAM vs. AUSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF (CAM) and Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAM | AUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.80 | 3.98 | -2.18 |
Drawdowns
CAM vs. AUSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAM drawdown since its inception was -2.19%, which is greater than AUSM's maximum drawdown of -0.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAM and AUSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAM | AUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.19% | -0.42% | -1.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -0.02% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.51% | -0.09% | -0.42% |
Volatility
CAM vs. AUSM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAM | AUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12% | 0.73% | +1.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.12% | 0.73% | +1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.12% | 0.73% | +1.39% |
CAM vs. AUSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAM has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than AUSM's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CAM vs. AUSM - Dividend Comparison
CAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than AUSM's 2.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AUSM Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF | 2.39% | 1.26% |
CAM AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF | 2.25% | 0.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAM and AUSM have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AUSM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AUSM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for CAM.
AUSM has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 2.25% for CAM.
They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for CAM and 0.18% for AUSM.
Find the right allocation for CAM and AUSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer