PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CALM vs. HLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CALM vs. HLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (CALM) and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CALM achieves a -0.54% return, which is significantly lower than HLT's 20.55% return. Over the past 10 years, CALM has underperformed HLT with an annualized return of 9.86%, while HLT has yielded a comparatively higher 48.93% annualized return.


CALM

1D
-2.22%
1M
-1.77%
YTD
-0.54%
6M
-8.91%
1Y
-13.33%
3Y*
23.34%
5Y*
22.16%
10Y*
9.86%

HLT

1D
1.20%
1M
11.14%
YTD
20.55%
6M
23.56%
1Y
38.36%
3Y*
34.51%
5Y*
22.21%
10Y*
48.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CALM vs. HLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CALM
Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.
-0.54%-15.61%87.00%14.48%51.87%-1.38%-12.19%2.09%-3.90%0.62%
HLT
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
20.55%16.49%36.11%44.68%-18.72%40.20%0.47%55.48%-9.40%829.98%

Correlation

The correlation between CALM and HLT is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CALM:

$3.70B

HLT:

$80.26B

EPS

CALM:

$14.48

HLT:

$6.50

PE Ratio

CALM:

5.39

HLT:

53.23

PEG Ratio

CALM:

0.00

HLT:

0.86

PS Ratio

CALM:

1.08

HLT:

6.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

CALM:

$3.46B

HLT:

$12.28B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CALM:

$1.17B

HLT:

$5.44B

EBITDA (TTM)

CALM:

$1.05B

HLT:

$3.00B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CALM vs. HLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CALM
CALM Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
CALM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CALM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CALM Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
CALM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
CALM Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

HLT
HLT Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
HLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLT Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
HLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLT Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CALM vs. HLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (CALM) and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CALMHLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.29

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.36

3.75

-4.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.56

8.72

-9.28

CALM vs. HLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CALM Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the HLT Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CALM and HLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CALM vs. HLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CALM drawdown since its inception was -74.08%, which is greater than HLT's maximum drawdown of -50.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CALM and HLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CALMHLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.08%

-50.82%

-23.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.00%

-10.29%

-26.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.00%

-26.35%

-10.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.00%

-32.65%

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.12%

-50.82%

+11.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.17%

0.00%

-31.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.31%

-9.71%

-20.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.95%

4.42%

+19.53%

Volatility

CALM vs. HLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. (CALM) is 6.31%, while Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) has a volatility of 6.84%. This indicates that CALM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CALMHLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.31%

6.84%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.43%

17.39%

+3.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.03%

23.16%

+9.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.61%

27.06%

+5.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.13%

180.96%

-149.83%

Dividends

CALM vs. HLT - Dividend Comparison

CALM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.15%, more than HLT's 0.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CALM
Cal-Maine Foods, Inc.
6.15%10.90%2.82%7.51%3.17%0.09%0.00%0.98%1.03%0.00%2.70%4.10%
HLT
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
0.17%0.21%0.24%0.33%0.36%0.00%0.13%0.54%0.84%31.40%1.03%0.65%

Financials

CALM vs. HLT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
666.95M
2.94B
(CALM) Total Revenue
(HLT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CALM vs. HLT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
17.9%
40.3%
Portfolio components
CALM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. reported a gross profit of 119.28M and revenue of 666.95M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.9%.

HLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.18B and revenue of 2.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.

CALM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. reported an operating income of 35.98M and revenue of 666.95M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.4%.

HLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 678.00M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.

CALM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. reported a net income of 50.46M and revenue of 666.95M, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.

HLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 385.00M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CALM and HLT have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HLT has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to CALM (6.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CALM dropped -74.08% vs HLT's -50.82%.

HLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CALM and HLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer