CALI vs. SLV
CALI (iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - CALI is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the ICE AMT-Free California Municipal Index, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CALI returned 2.99% vs 110.59% for SLV. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CALI charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
CALI vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CALI achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly lower than SLV's 2.78% return.
CALI
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 0.91%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 2.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLV
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 110.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
CALI vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CALI iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF | 0.91% | 3.28% | 2.84% | 1.97% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 2.78% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -4.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between CALI and SLV is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CALI vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
CALI
SLV
CALI vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF (CALI) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CALI | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.94 | 1.35 | +0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.49 | 2.62 | +1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.91 | 5.64 | +17.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CALI | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.97 | 1.89 | +2.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.84 | 0.25 | +2.59 |
Drawdowns
CALI vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CALI drawdown since its inception was -0.78%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CALI and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CALI | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.78% | -76.28% | +75.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.67% | -42.45% | +41.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -42.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -37.30% | +37.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -44.67% | +44.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.13% | 19.67% | -19.54% |
Volatility
CALI vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF (CALI) is 0.22%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that CALI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CALI | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.22% | 16.30% | -16.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.51% | 58.31% | -57.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76% | 58.90% | -58.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.11% | 36.15% | -35.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.11% | 31.84% | -30.73% |
CALI vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CALI has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CALI vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
CALI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CALI iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF | 2.52% | 2.62% | 3.14% | 1.37% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CALI and SLV have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to CALI (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CALI dropped -0.78% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 1-year performance, SLV leads with 110.59% vs 2.99% for CALI. On fees, CALI is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, CALI has been the lower-risk option at 0.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SLV has performed better with a 110.59% return vs 2.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CALI is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
CALI has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
CALI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while SLV is Silver. CALI tracks ICE AMT-Free California Municipal Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for CALI and 0.50% for SLV.
CALI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.97 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CALI and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer