CALF vs. WCEO
CALF (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF) and WCEO (Hypatia Women CEO ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. CALF is passively managed, while WCEO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CALF returned 9.33%/yr vs 15.15%/yr for WCEO. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CALF charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for WCEO.
Performance
CALF vs. WCEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CALF achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly lower than WCEO's 12.92% return.
CALF
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 10.59%
- 6M
- 8.95%
- 1Y
- 25.83%
- 3Y*
- 9.33%
- 5Y*
- 3.73%
- 10Y*
- —
WCEO
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 3.19%
- YTD
- 12.92%
- 6M
- 11.06%
- 1Y
- 30.87%
- 3Y*
- 15.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CALF vs. WCEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 10.59% | 2.33% | -7.41% | 33.02% |
WCEO Hypatia Women CEO ETF | 12.92% | 9.77% | 8.28% | 10.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between CALF and WCEO is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2023 | 0.88 |
The correlation between CALF and WCEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
CALF vs. WCEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CALF
WCEO
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
Utilities
-
Technology
CALF
WCEO
Consumer Cyclical
CALF
WCEO
Healthcare
CALF
WCEO
Energy
CALF
WCEO
Communication Services
CALF
WCEO
Industrials
CALF
WCEO
Consumer Defensive
CALF
WCEO
Basic Materials
CALF
WCEO
Real Estate
CALF
WCEO
Financial Services
CALF
WCEO
Utilities
CALF
-
WCEO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CALF vs. WCEO — Risk / Return Rank
CALF
WCEO
CALF vs. WCEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) and Hypatia Women CEO ETF (WCEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CALF | WCEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.35 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.22 | 4.46 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.59 | 13.87 | -2.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CALF vs. WCEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CALF drawdown since its inception was -47.58%, which is greater than WCEO's maximum drawdown of -25.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CALF and WCEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CALF | WCEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.58% | -25.88% | -21.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.15% | -6.96% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.22% | -25.88% | -8.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.33% | -0.56% | -3.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.69% | -5.45% | -5.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 2.23% | 0.00% |
Volatility
CALF vs. WCEO - Volatility Comparison
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) has a higher volatility of 5.39% compared to Hypatia Women CEO ETF (WCEO) at 3.75%. This indicates that CALF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WCEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CALF | WCEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.39% | 3.75% | +1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.92% | 10.43% | +0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.05% | 15.25% | +0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.39% | 18.08% | +5.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.97% | 18.08% | +7.89% |
CALF vs. WCEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CALF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than WCEO's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
CALF vs. WCEO - Dividend Comparison
CALF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than WCEO's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.24% | 1.43% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 2.63% | 0.82% | 0.99% | 1.39% | 0.70% |
WCEO Hypatia Women CEO ETF | 0.57% | 0.64% | 0.88% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CALF and WCEO have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CALF has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to WCEO (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CALF dropped -47.58% vs WCEO's -25.88%.
On 3-year performance, WCEO leads with 15.15% vs 9.33% for CALF. On fees, CALF is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, WCEO has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, WCEO has performed better with a 15.15% return vs 9.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CALF is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for WCEO.
CALF has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.57% for WCEO.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Hypatia Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CALF and 0.85% for WCEO.
WCEO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CALF and WCEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer