CALF vs. SMCF
CALF (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF) and SMCF (Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CALF is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index, while SMCF is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CALF returned 30.24% vs 32.87% for SMCF. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CALF charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for SMCF.
Performance
CALF vs. SMCF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CALF having a 13.34% return and SMCF slightly higher at 13.75%.
CALF
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- YTD
- 13.34%
- 6M
- 12.53%
- 1Y
- 30.24%
- 3Y*
- 10.69%
- 5Y*
- 4.12%
- 10Y*
- —
SMCF
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- YTD
- 13.75%
- 6M
- 13.63%
- 1Y
- 32.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CALF vs. SMCF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 13.34% | 2.33% | -7.41% | 4.95% |
SMCF Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF | 13.75% | 9.56% | 16.30% | 4.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between CALF and SMCF is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2023 | 0.84 |
The correlation between CALF and SMCF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
CALF vs. SMCF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CALF
SMCF
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Utilities
-
-
Technology
CALF
SMCF
Consumer Cyclical
CALF
SMCF
Energy
CALF
SMCF
Healthcare
CALF
SMCF
Communication Services
CALF
SMCF
Industrials
CALF
SMCF
Consumer Defensive
CALF
SMCF
Real Estate
CALF
SMCF
Basic Materials
CALF
SMCF
Financial Services
CALF
SMCF
Utilities
CALF
-
SMCF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CALF vs. SMCF — Risk / Return Rank
CALF
SMCF
CALF vs. SMCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) and Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CALF | SMCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.36 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.94 | 4.63 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.08 | 12.46 | +1.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CALF | SMCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.93 | 2.05 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.91 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
CALF vs. SMCF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CALF drawdown since its inception was -47.58%, which is greater than SMCF's maximum drawdown of -28.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CALF and SMCF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CALF | SMCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.58% | -28.48% | -19.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.15% | -7.13% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.95% | -2.44% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.74% | -5.29% | -5.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 2.65% | -0.50% |
Volatility
CALF vs. SMCF - Volatility Comparison
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF (SMCF) at 3.55%. This indicates that CALF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CALF | SMCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 3.55% | +1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.47% | 10.00% | +0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.84% | 16.18% | -0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.44% | 20.31% | +3.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.02% | 20.31% | +5.71% |
CALF vs. SMCF - Expense Ratio Comparison
CALF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SMCF's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
CALF vs. SMCF - Dividend Comparison
CALF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than SMCF's 3.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 2.63% | 0.82% | 0.99% | 1.39% | 0.70% |
SMCF Themes US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions ETF | 3.44% | 3.91% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CALF and SMCF have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CALF has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to SMCF (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CALF dropped -47.58% vs SMCF's -28.48%.
On 1-year performance, SMCF leads with 32.87% vs 30.24% for CALF. On fees, SMCF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, SMCF has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SMCF has performed better with a 32.87% return vs 30.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMCF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CALF.
SMCF has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 1.28% for CALF.
CALF is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SMCF is Small Cap Value Equities. CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index, while SMCF tracks Solactive US Small Cap Cash Flow Champions Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CALF and 0.29% for SMCF.
SMCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CALF and SMCF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer