PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CALF vs. PTLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CALF vs. PTLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CALF achieves a 13.34% return, which is significantly higher than PTLC's 5.53% return.


CALF

1D
-1.12%
1M
4.91%
YTD
13.34%
6M
12.53%
1Y
30.24%
3Y*
10.69%
5Y*
4.12%
10Y*

PTLC

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.98%
YTD
5.53%
6M
5.49%
1Y
21.41%
3Y*
14.93%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
11.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CALF vs. PTLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
13.34%2.33%-7.41%35.43%-15.20%40.68%16.55%18.18%-10.06%5.78%
PTLC
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF
5.53%5.10%24.31%16.78%-8.62%27.90%-1.15%17.58%1.49%10.21%

Correlation

The correlation between CALF and PTLC is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2017

0.55

The correlation between CALF and PTLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

CALF vs. PTLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CALF
PTLC

Technology

29.7%
35.6%

Consumer Cyclical

28.3%
10.1%

Energy

10.3%
3.5%

Healthcare

9.4%
8.5%

Communication Services

8.8%
11.2%

Industrials

5.9%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
4.9%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.6%
1.8%

Financial Services

0.2%
11.8%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Technology

CALF
29.7%
PTLC
35.6%

Consumer Cyclical

CALF
28.3%
PTLC
10.1%

Energy

CALF
10.3%
PTLC
3.5%

Healthcare

CALF
9.4%
PTLC
8.5%

Communication Services

CALF
8.8%
PTLC
11.2%

Industrials

CALF
5.9%
PTLC
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

CALF
4.3%
PTLC
4.9%

Real Estate

CALF
1.6%
PTLC
1.9%

Basic Materials

CALF
1.6%
PTLC
1.8%

Financial Services

CALF
0.2%
PTLC
11.8%

Utilities

CALF

-

PTLC
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CALF vs. PTLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CALF
CALF Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CALF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CALF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CALF Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CALF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CALF Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

PTLC
PTLC Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
PTLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTLC Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
PTLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTLC Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CALF vs. PTLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CALFPTLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.34

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.94

2.45

+2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.08

9.71

+4.37

CALF vs. PTLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CALF Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the PTLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CALF and PTLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CALFPTLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

1.91

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.92

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.70

-0.33

Drawdowns

CALF vs. PTLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CALF drawdown since its inception was -47.58%, which is greater than PTLC's maximum drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CALF and PTLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CALFPTLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.58%

-26.63%

-20.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.15%

-8.77%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.22%

-15.17%

-19.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.22%

-15.17%

-19.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.95%

-0.74%

-1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.74%

-5.64%

-5.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

2.21%

-0.06%

Volatility

CALF vs. PTLC - Volatility Comparison

Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) at 2.88%. This indicates that CALF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CALFPTLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.92%

2.88%

+2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.47%

8.15%

+2.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.84%

11.27%

+4.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.44%

11.73%

+11.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.02%

13.17%

+12.85%

CALF vs. PTLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CALF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than PTLC's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

CALF vs. PTLC - Dividend Comparison

CALF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than PTLC's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.28%1.43%1.07%1.18%0.85%2.63%0.82%0.99%1.39%0.70%0.00%0.00%
PTLC
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF
1.01%1.06%0.67%1.18%1.26%0.73%1.08%1.10%1.00%0.97%1.08%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


CALF and PTLC have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CALF has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to PTLC (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CALF dropped -47.58% vs PTLC's -26.63%.

On 5-year performance, PTLC leads with 10.72% vs 4.12% for CALF. On fees, CALF is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, PTLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PTLC has performed better with a 10.72% return vs 4.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CALF is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTLC.

CALF has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 1.01% for PTLC.

CALF is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while PTLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index, while PTLC tracks Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CALF and 0.60% for PTLC.

CALF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CALF and PTLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer