CAIQ vs. SGOV
CAIQ (Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF) and SGOV (iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CAIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the MerQube Nasdaq-100 Vol Advantage Autocallable Index, while SGOV is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. CAIQ charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SGOV.
Performance
CAIQ vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAIQ achieves a 12.96% return, which is significantly higher than SGOV's 1.63% return.
CAIQ
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 12.96%
- 6M
- 14.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGOV
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 3.93%
- 3Y*
- 4.69%
- 5Y*
- 3.56%
- 10Y*
- —
CAIQ vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF | 12.96% | 4.03% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 1.63% | 0.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAIQ and SGOV is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAIQ vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank
CAIQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SGOV
CAIQ vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF (CAIQ) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAIQ | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 194.55 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 396.11 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4,438.60 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAIQ vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAIQ drawdown since its inception was -9.06%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAIQ and SGOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAIQ | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.06% | -0.03% | -9.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | 0.00% | -0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.70% | -0.00% | -1.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility
CAIQ vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAIQ | SGOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.05% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.13% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.91% | 0.19% | +13.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 0.24% | +13.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 0.24% | +13.67% |
CAIQ vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAIQ has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAIQ vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison
CAIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.50%, more than SGOV's 3.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF | 8.50% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SGOV iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF | 3.85% | 4.10% | 5.10% | 4.87% | 1.45% | 0.03% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAIQ and SGOV have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for CAIQ.
CAIQ has the higher dividend yield at 8.50%, compared with 3.85% for SGOV.
CAIQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SGOV is Ultrashort Bond. CAIQ tracks MerQube Nasdaq-100 Vol Advantage Autocallable Index, while SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for CAIQ and 0.09% for SGOV.
Find the right allocation for CAIQ and SGOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer