CAIQ vs. ERX
CAIQ (Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF) and ERX (Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - CAIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the MerQube Nasdaq-100 Vol Advantage Autocallable Index, while ERX is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index (300%). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. CAIQ charges 0.74%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for ERX.
Performance
CAIQ vs. ERX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAIQ achieves a 10.57% return, which is significantly lower than ERX's 57.54% return.
CAIQ
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- 6M
- 9.78%
- YTD
- 10.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ERX
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- 6.94%
- 6M
- 39.75%
- YTD
- 57.54%
- 1Y
- 68.66%
- 3Y*
- 19.68%
- 5Y*
- 34.10%
- 10Y*
- -10.35%
CAIQ vs. ERX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF | 10.57% | 4.03% |
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 57.54% | -0.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAIQ and ERX is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | -0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAIQ vs. ERX — Risk / Return Rank
CAIQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ERX
CAIQ vs. ERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF (CAIQ) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAIQ | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.30 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.95 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAIQ vs. ERX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAIQ drawdown since its inception was -9.06%, smaller than the maximum ERX drawdown of -99.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAIQ and ERX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAIQ | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.06% | -99.54% | +90.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -29.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -98.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.63% | -92.05% | +89.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -67.18% | +65.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.57% | — |
Volatility
CAIQ vs. ERX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAIQ | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 33.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.43% | 42.09% | -28.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.43% | 51.72% | -38.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.43% | 68.92% | -55.49% |
CAIQ vs. ERX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAIQ has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than ERX's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAIQ vs. ERX - Dividend Comparison
CAIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.27%, more than ERX's 1.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF | 10.27% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 1.62% | 2.54% | 2.94% | 3.17% | 2.23% | 2.16% | 2.35% | 1.56% | 3.10% | 0.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAIQ and ERX have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CAIQ is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CAIQ is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for ERX.
CAIQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.27%, compared with 1.62% for ERX.
CAIQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ERX is Leveraged Equities. CAIQ tracks MerQube Nasdaq-100 Vol Advantage Autocallable Index, while ERX tracks Energy Select Sector Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for CAIQ and 1.09% for ERX.
Find the right allocation for CAIQ and ERX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer