CAIQ vs. DBO

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

CAIQ (Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - CAIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the MerQube Nasdaq-100 Vol Advantage Autocallable Index, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.32, they often move in opposite directions. CAIQ charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.

Performance

CAIQ vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF (CAIQ) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAIQ achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 76.15% return.

CAIQ

• 1D: -1.66%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 11.17%
• 6M: 10.46%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DBO

• 1D: -2.05%
• 1M: 1.22%
• YTD: 76.15%
• 6M: 69.63%
• 1Y: 72.26%
• 3Y*: 20.11%
• 5Y*: 14.88%
• 10Y*: 10.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAIQ vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF	11.17%	4.03%
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	76.15%	-1.29%

Correlation

The correlation between CAIQ and DBO is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025	-0.32

Return for Risk

CAIQ vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBO

DBO Risk / Return Rank: 62
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 57
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAIQ vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF (CAIQ) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CAIQ	DBO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.10	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.23	0.01	+2.22

Drawdowns

CAIQ vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAIQ drawdown since its inception was -9.06%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAIQ and DBO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAIQ	DBO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.06%	-90.18%	+81.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-18.19%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-28.20%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.10%	-53.65%	+51.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.72%	-62.25%	+60.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.96%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CAIQ	DBO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	28.43%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.15%	34.63%	-20.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.15%	32.31%	-18.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.15%	31.79%	-17.64%

CAIQ vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAIQ has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

CAIQ vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

CAIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.64%, more than DBO's 1.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF	8.64%	1.54%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund	1.99%	3.51%	4.68%	4.59%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	1.63%	1.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CAIQ and DBO in my portfolio?

CAIQ and DBO have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CAIQ or DBO?

On fees, CAIQ is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CAIQ or DBO?

CAIQ is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CAIQ or DBO?

CAIQ has the higher dividend yield at 8.64%, compared with 1.99% for DBO.

What is the main difference between CAIQ and DBO?

CAIQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while DBO is Oil & Gas. CAIQ tracks MerQube Nasdaq-100 Vol Advantage Autocallable Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for CAIQ and 0.78% for DBO.