CAIQ vs. BINC

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

CAIQ (Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF) and BINC (iShares Flexible Income Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CAIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the MerQube Nasdaq-100 Vol Advantage Autocallable Index, while BINC is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by iShares. CAIQ is passively managed, while BINC is actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CAIQ charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BINC.

Performance

CAIQ vs. BINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF (CAIQ) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAIQ achieves a 12.96% return, which is significantly higher than BINC's 1.29% return.

CAIQ

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: 1.36%
• YTD: 12.96%
• 6M: 14.11%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BINC

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.92%
• YTD: 1.29%
• 6M: 1.78%
• 1Y: 5.90%
• 3Y*: 7.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAIQ vs. BINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF	12.96%	4.03%
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF	1.29%	1.06%

Correlation

The correlation between CAIQ and BINC is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025	0.48

Return for Risk

CAIQ vs. BINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAIQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BINC

BINC Risk / Return Rank: 74
BINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
BINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
BINC Omega Ratio Rank: 90
BINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
BINC Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAIQ vs. BINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF (CAIQ) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CAIQ	BINC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.58	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.77	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.52	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.20	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.60	—

Drawdowns

CAIQ vs. BINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAIQ drawdown since its inception was -9.06%, which is greater than BINC's maximum drawdown of -2.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAIQ and BINC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAIQ	BINC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.06%	-2.69%	-6.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.69%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-2.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.52%	-0.10%	-0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.70%	-0.36%	-1.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.69%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CAIQ	BINC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.75%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.87%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.91%	2.30%	+11.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.91%	2.99%	+10.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.91%	2.99%	+10.92%

CAIQ vs. BINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAIQ has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than BINC's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

CAIQ vs. BINC - Dividend Comparison

CAIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.50%, more than BINC's 5.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF	5.84%	5.86%	6.14%	3.13%
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF	8.50%	1.54%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CAIQ and BINC in my portfolio?

CAIQ and BINC have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CAIQ or BINC?

On fees, BINC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CAIQ or BINC?

BINC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for CAIQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CAIQ or BINC?

CAIQ has the higher dividend yield at 8.50%, compared with 5.84% for BINC.

What is the main difference between CAIQ and BINC?

CAIQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while BINC is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for CAIQ and 0.40% for BINC.