PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAIFX vs. CDDYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAIFX vs. CDDYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-2 (CAIFX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CAIFX having a 7.86% return and CDDYX slightly higher at 8.15%. Over the past 10 years, CAIFX has underperformed CDDYX with an annualized return of 8.17%, while CDDYX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.64% annualized return.


CAIFX

1D
0.57%
1M
2.03%
YTD
7.86%
6M
8.66%
1Y
18.75%
3Y*
15.46%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
8.17%

CDDYX

1D
0.94%
1M
1.47%
YTD
8.15%
6M
8.50%
1Y
20.48%
3Y*
16.70%
5Y*
10.80%
10Y*
12.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAIFX vs. CDDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAIFX
American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-2
7.86%20.63%10.47%9.21%-6.95%15.26%3.41%17.49%-7.10%14.19%
CDDYX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class
8.15%15.95%15.17%10.65%-4.84%26.43%7.92%28.74%-4.27%20.34%

Correlation

The correlation between CAIFX and CDDYX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2012

0.88

The correlation between CAIFX and CDDYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAIFX vs. CDDYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAIFX
CAIFX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
CAIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
CAIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

CDDYX
CDDYX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CDDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
CDDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAIFX vs. CDDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-2 (CAIFX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CAIFXCDDYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.41

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

3.83

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.65

14.44

-2.78

CAIFX vs. CDDYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAIFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the CDDYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAIFX and CDDYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CAIFXCDDYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.33

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.82

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.81

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.88

-0.33

Drawdowns

CAIFX vs. CDDYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAIFX drawdown since its inception was -36.83%, which is greater than CDDYX's maximum drawdown of -32.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAIFX and CDDYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAIFXCDDYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.83%

-32.74%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-5.51%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.88%

-12.99%

+4.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.51%

-16.91%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.27%

-32.74%

+7.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.30%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.71%

-2.77%

-1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

1.46%

+0.16%

Volatility

CAIFX vs. CDDYX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-2 (CAIFX) and Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class (CDDYX) have volatilities of 2.47% and 2.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAIFXCDDYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

2.48%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.41%

6.87%

-0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.99%

9.07%

-1.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.98%

13.27%

-3.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.88%

15.69%

-4.81%

CAIFX vs. CDDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAIFX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than CDDYX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAIFX vs. CDDYX - Dividend Comparison

CAIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.42%, more than CDDYX's 4.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAIFX
American Funds Capital Income Builder Fund Class F-2
7.42%7.93%5.98%3.69%3.66%3.36%3.60%4.31%3.76%4.63%3.73%3.82%
CDDYX
Columbia Dividend Income Fund Institutional 3 Class
4.97%5.33%5.99%4.96%3.90%2.93%1.85%3.28%7.65%4.03%3.84%8.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAIFX and CDDYX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDDYX has higher volatility (2.48%) compared to CAIFX (2.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAIFX dropped -36.83% vs CDDYX's -32.74%.

CAIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAIFX and CDDYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer