CAGG.TO vs. CAGS.TO
CAGG.TO (CI Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF) and CAGS.TO (CI Canadian Short-Term Aggregate Bond Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CAGG.TO is a Total Bond Market fund managed by CI, while CAGS.TO is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by CI. Over the past 5 years, CAGG.TO returned 0.44%/yr vs 2.10%/yr for CAGS.TO. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CAGG.TO vs. CAGS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CAGG.TO having a 1.17% return and CAGS.TO slightly higher at 1.19%.
CAGG.TO
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- 4.14%
- 3Y*
- 4.50%
- 5Y*
- 0.44%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.69%
CAGS.TO
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 3.25%
- 3Y*
- 5.01%
- 5Y*
- 2.10%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.33%
CAGG.TO vs. CAGS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAGG.TO CI Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 1.17% | 2.45% | 4.41% | 7.28% | -11.36% | -3.39% | 7.32% | 9.39% | 0.30% | 1.25% |
CAGS.TO CI Canadian Short-Term Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 1.19% | 3.95% | 6.07% | 5.02% | -4.30% | -1.22% | 4.47% | 4.33% | 1.41% | 0.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAGG.TO and CAGS.TO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2017 | 0.45 |
The correlation between CAGG.TO and CAGS.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAGG.TO vs. CAGS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CAGG.TO
CAGS.TO
CAGG.TO vs. CAGS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAGG.TO) and CI Canadian Short-Term Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAGS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAGG.TO | CAGS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.32 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 2.45 | -0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.76 | 7.38 | -3.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAGG.TO vs. CAGS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.77%, which is greater than CAGS.TO's maximum drawdown of -11.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAGG.TO and CAGS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAGG.TO | CAGS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.77% | -11.60% | -7.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.73% | -1.33% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.43% | -1.33% | -3.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.68% | -7.58% | -9.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -0.27% | -1.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.47% | -1.45% | -4.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.10% | 0.44% | +0.66% |
Volatility
CAGG.TO vs. CAGS.TO - Volatility Comparison
CI Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAGG.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.38% compared to CI Canadian Short-Term Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAGS.TO) at 0.68%. This indicates that CAGG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAGS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAGG.TO | CAGS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.38% | 0.68% | +0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.27% | 1.62% | +1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.25% | 2.06% | +2.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.18% | 2.76% | +3.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.03% | 4.62% | +2.41% |
Dividends
CAGG.TO vs. CAGS.TO - Dividend Comparison
CAGG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than CAGS.TO's 3.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAGG.TO CI Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 3.56% | 3.36% | 2.82% | 3.25% | 4.11% | 2.42% | 2.77% | 3.00% | 2.74% | 1.51% |
CAGS.TO CI Canadian Short-Term Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 3.28% | 3.16% | 3.37% | 2.62% | 2.61% | 1.96% | 2.59% | 2.83% | 2.72% | 1.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAGG.TO and CAGS.TO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CAGG.TO is categorized as Total Bond Market, while CAGS.TO is Short-Term Bond.
Find the right allocation for CAGG.TO and CAGS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer