CAGE vs. OMAH

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

CAGE (Calamos Autocallable Growth ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CAGE vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Autocallable Growth ETF (CAGE) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CAGE

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: -2.33%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: 6.11%
• 6M: 5.60%
• 1Y: 11.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAGE vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CAGE Calamos Autocallable Growth ETF	10.75%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between CAGE and OMAH is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2026	0.21

Return for Risk

CAGE vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAGE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 53
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 41
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAGE vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Autocallable Growth ETF (CAGE) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CAGE	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.38	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.94	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.24	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.69	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.67	—

Drawdowns

CAGE vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAGE drawdown since its inception was -6.60%, smaller than the maximum OMAH drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAGE and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAGE	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.60%	-11.83%	+5.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.70%	-1.22%	-1.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.64%	-1.27%	-0.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.28%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CAGE	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.27%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.64%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.47%	8.05%	+12.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.47%	12.95%	+7.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.47%	12.95%	+7.52%

Dividends

CAGE vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

CAGE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OMAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.37%.

Position	TTM	2025
CAGE Calamos Autocallable Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	15.37%	12.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CAGE and OMAH in my portfolio?

CAGE and OMAH have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CAGE or OMAH?

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.37%, compared with 0.00% for CAGE.

What is the main difference between CAGE and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: Calamos and VistaShares.