CAGE.TO vs. MEQT.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Avantis CIBC All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CAGE.TO) and Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF (MEQT.TO).
CAGE.TO and MEQT.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CAGE.TO is an actively managed fund by Avantis. It was launched on Mar 18, 2026. MEQT.TO is an actively managed fund by Mackenzie Investments. It was launched on Nov 20, 2023.
Performance
CAGE.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CAGE.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CAGE.TO Avantis CIBC All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF | 1.44% |
MEQT.TO Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF | -0.05% |
Returns By Period
CAGE.TO
- 1D
- 2.40%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MEQT.TO
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 4.06%
- 1Y
- 22.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CAGE.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
CAGE.TO vs. MEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CAGE.TO
MEQT.TO
CAGE.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis CIBC All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF (CAGE.TO) and Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF (MEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAGE.TO | MEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.21 | 1.77 | +0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between CAGE.TO and MEQT.TO is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CAGE.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison
CAGE.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CAGE.TO Avantis CIBC All-Equity Asset Allocation ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MEQT.TO Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF | 1.63% | 1.60% | 1.73% | 0.81% |
Drawdowns
CAGE.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAGE.TO drawdown since its inception was -2.93%, smaller than the maximum MEQT.TO drawdown of -15.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAGE.TO and MEQT.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAGE.TO | MEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.93% | -15.14% | +12.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.89% | +4.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.09% | -1.32% | +0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.49% | — |
Volatility
CAGE.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CAGE.TO | MEQT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.75% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.65% | 13.61% | +10.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.65% | 11.90% | +11.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.65% | 11.90% | +11.75% |