CAEIX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
CAEIX is managed by Calvert Research and Management. It was launched on May 30, 2007. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
CAEIX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CAEIX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAEIX Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund | 4.22% | 32.61% | -7.13% | 5.67% | -17.43% | 6.73% | 61.52% | 33.48% | -19.26% | 29.65% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAEIX achieves a 4.22% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 8.35% return. Over the past 10 years, CAEIX has outperformed CSUAX with an annualized return of 9.93%, while CSUAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.
CAEIX
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -7.32%
- YTD
- 4.22%
- 6M
- 8.40%
- 1Y
- 41.40%
- 3Y*
- 7.69%
- 5Y*
- 3.40%
- 10Y*
- 9.93%
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CAEIX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAEIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CAEIX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
CAEIX
CSUAX
CAEIX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CAEIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.20 | 1.63 | +0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.90 | 2.17 | +0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.32 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 2.36 | +1.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.41 | 10.32 | +4.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAEIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | 1.63 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.61 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.50 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.55 | -0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between CAEIX and CSUAX is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CAEIX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
CAEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAEIX Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund | 0.69% | 0.72% | 1.17% | 1.07% | 0.86% | 0.49% | 0.82% | 1.23% | 2.00% | 1.40% | 1.79% | 0.72% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
CAEIX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAEIX drawdown since its inception was -75.81%, which is greater than CSUAX's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAEIX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAEIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.81% | -52.20% | -23.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.07% | -7.98% | -3.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.58% | -20.45% | -12.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.54% | -35.05% | -2.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.12% | -4.38% | -8.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.06% | -8.49% | -40.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 1.83% | +0.79% |
Volatility
CAEIX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund (CAEIX) has a higher volatility of 6.88% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.26%. This indicates that CAEIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CAEIX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.88% | 3.26% | +3.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.14% | 6.89% | +5.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.28% | 11.48% | +6.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.08% | 12.89% | +6.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.61% | 14.89% | +4.72% |