PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CADL vs. MDIA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CADL vs. MDIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Candel Therapeutics, Inc. (CADL) and MediaCo Holding Inc. (MDIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CADL achieves a 61.95% return, which is significantly higher than MDIA's 37.93% return.


CADL

1D
10.11%
1M
14.52%
YTD
61.95%
6M
54.04%
1Y
92.63%
3Y*
86.97%
5Y*
10Y*

MDIA

1D
5.18%
1M
-11.44%
YTD
37.93%
6M
26.40%
1Y
-25.23%
3Y*
-11.27%
5Y*
-27.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CADL vs. MDIA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CADL
Candel Therapeutics, Inc.
61.95%-34.91%490.48%-17.88%-77.11%-2.25%
MDIA
MediaCo Holding Inc.
37.93%-49.12%165.42%-62.60%-78.53%-10.68%

Correlation

The correlation between CADL and MDIA is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2021

0.04

The correlation between CADL and MDIA shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CADL:

$570.61M

MDIA:

$63.51M

EPS

CADL:

-$0.97

MDIA:

-$0.83

PB Ratio

CADL:

4.13

MDIA:

12.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

CADL:

$0.00

MDIA:

$133.34M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CADL:

-$600.00K

MDIA:

$0.00

EBITDA (TTM)

CADL:

-$71.64M

MDIA:

-$74.46M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CADL vs. MDIA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CADL
CADL Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CADL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CADL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
CADL Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CADL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CADL Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

MDIA
MDIA Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
MDIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDIA Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MDIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDIA Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CADL vs. MDIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Candel Therapeutics, Inc. (CADL) and MediaCo Holding Inc. (MDIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CADLMDIADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

0.99

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

-0.40

+2.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.52

-0.63

+5.15

CADL vs. MDIA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CADL Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is higher than the MDIA Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CADL and MDIA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CADL vs. MDIA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CADL drawdown since its inception was -94.33%, roughly equal to the maximum MDIA drawdown of -97.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CADL and MDIA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CADLMDIADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.33%

-97.56%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.04%

-63.27%

+26.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-72.86%

-90.16%

+17.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.64%

-95.29%

+60.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.57%

-80.34%

+17.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.57%

40.15%

-19.58%

Volatility

CADL vs. MDIA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Candel Therapeutics, Inc. (CADL) is 18.78%, while MediaCo Holding Inc. (MDIA) has a volatility of 26.72%. This indicates that CADL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CADLMDIADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.78%

26.72%

-7.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.74%

50.05%

+2.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.67%

70.36%

+3.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

166.61%

205.31%

-38.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

166.61%

248.32%

-81.71%

Dividends

CADL vs. MDIA - Dividend Comparison

Neither CADL nor MDIA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CADL vs. MDIA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Candel Therapeutics, Inc. and MediaCo Holding Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M202220232024202520260
38.66M
(CADL) Total Revenue
(MDIA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CADL and MDIA have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDIA has higher volatility (26.72%) compared to CADL (18.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CADL dropped -94.33% vs MDIA's -97.56%.

CADL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CADL and MDIA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer