PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CACX.L vs. SP5L.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CACX.L vs. SP5L.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) and Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CACX.L is traded in GBp, while SP5L.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SP5L.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CACX.L achieves a 4.40% return, which is significantly lower than SP5L.L's 10.71% return. Over the past 10 years, CACX.L has underperformed SP5L.L with an annualized return of 10.96%, while SP5L.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.32% annualized return.


CACX.L

1D
0.28%
1M
2.07%
YTD
4.40%
6M
3.83%
1Y
13.13%
3Y*
7.43%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
10.96%

SP5L.L

1D
0.87%
1M
0.31%
YTD
10.71%
6M
10.57%
1Y
26.29%
3Y*
18.74%
5Y*
14.01%
10Y*
13.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CACX.L vs. SP5L.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CACX.L
Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
4.40%19.60%-4.39%16.83%-0.56%22.14%0.79%26.03%-5.19%19.33%
SP5L.L
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc
10.71%9.50%27.60%19.99%-8.84%31.19%13.92%26.93%1.00%-5.12%

Correlation

The correlation between CACX.L and SP5L.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2014

0.53

The correlation between CACX.L and SP5L.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (3 years) to 0.55 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CACX.L vs. SP5L.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CACX.L
SP5L.L

Industrials

35.3%
7.8%

Financial Services

15.4%
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

14.8%
9.9%

Energy

9.5%
3.1%

Healthcare

9.4%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.5%

Technology

4.0%
39.0%

Communication Services

3.2%
10.6%

Basic Materials

2.4%
1.7%

Real Estate

0.8%
1.8%

Utilities

0.5%
2.1%

Industrials

CACX.L
35.3%
SP5L.L
7.8%

Financial Services

CACX.L
15.4%
SP5L.L
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

CACX.L
14.8%
SP5L.L
9.9%

Energy

CACX.L
9.5%
SP5L.L
3.1%

Healthcare

CACX.L
9.4%
SP5L.L
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

CACX.L
4.8%
SP5L.L
4.5%

Technology

CACX.L
4.0%
SP5L.L
39.0%

Communication Services

CACX.L
3.2%
SP5L.L
10.6%

Basic Materials

CACX.L
2.4%
SP5L.L
1.7%

Real Estate

CACX.L
0.8%
SP5L.L
1.8%

Utilities

CACX.L
0.5%
SP5L.L
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CACX.L vs. SP5L.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CACX.L
CACX.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
CACX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CACX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
CACX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
CACX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
CACX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

SP5L.L
SP5L.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SP5L.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SP5L.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SP5L.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SP5L.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SP5L.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CACX.L vs. SP5L.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) and Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CACX.LSP5L.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.44

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

3.63

-2.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.33

12.83

-9.50

CACX.L vs. SP5L.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CACX.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the SP5L.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CACX.L and SP5L.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CACX.L vs. SP5L.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CACX.L drawdown since its inception was -54.68%, which is greater than SP5L.L's maximum drawdown of -25.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CACX.L and SP5L.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CACX.LSP5L.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.68%

-25.47%

-29.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.81%

-7.20%

-4.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.77%

-21.12%

+6.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.36%

-21.12%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.83%

-25.47%

-7.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-0.49%

-1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.41%

-5.15%

-14.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.93%

2.04%

+1.89%

Volatility

CACX.L vs. SP5L.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) is 2.82%, while Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that CACX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SP5L.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CACX.LSP5L.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

3.81%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

7.84%

+3.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.31%

10.96%

+3.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.69%

18.80%

-2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.58%

17.97%

-0.39%

CACX.L vs. SP5L.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CACX.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SP5L.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CACX.L vs. SP5L.L - Dividend Comparison

CACX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, while SP5L.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CACX.L
Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
2.78%2.90%3.00%2.79%2.54%1.95%1.66%4.70%6.43%4.82%3.49%3.46%
SP5L.L
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CACX.L and SP5L.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SP5L.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SP5L.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CACX.L.

CACX.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while SP5L.L is S&P 500. CACX.L tracks Euronext Paris CAC 40 NR EUR, while SP5L.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CACX.L and 0.07% for SP5L.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CACX.L and SP5L.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer