CACX.L vs. ^NDX
CACX.L (Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) is Europe Equities fund tracking the Euronext Paris CAC 40 NR EUR, while ^NDX (NASDAQ 100 Index) is an index. Over the past 10 years, CACX.L returned 10.55%/yr vs 21.89%/yr for ^NDX. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CACX.L vs. ^NDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CACX.L is traded in GBp, while ^NDX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^NDX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CACX.L achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly lower than ^NDX's 20.92% return. Over the past 10 years, CACX.L has underperformed ^NDX with an annualized return of 10.55%, while ^NDX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.89% annualized return.
CACX.L
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 2.64%
- 1Y
- 11.49%
- 3Y*
- 7.70%
- 5Y*
- 8.00%
- 10Y*
- 10.55%
^NDX
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 9.54%
- YTD
- 20.92%
- 6M
- 18.04%
- 1Y
- 41.34%
- 3Y*
- 24.62%
- 5Y*
- 18.43%
- 10Y*
- 21.89%
CACX.L vs. ^NDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACX.L Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 2.53% | 19.60% | -4.39% | 16.83% | -0.56% | 22.14% | 0.79% | 23.85% | -7.71% | 17.11% |
^NDX NASDAQ 100 Index | 20.92% | 11.61% | 27.06% | 46.12% | -25.00% | 27.83% | 43.25% | 32.72% | 4.83% | 20.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between CACX.L and ^NDX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2014 | 0.36 |
The correlation between CACX.L and ^NDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (3 years) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CACX.L vs. ^NDX — Risk / Return Rank
CACX.L
^NDX
CACX.L vs. ^NDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) and NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CACX.L | ^NDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.47 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | 3.45 | -2.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.95 | 10.41 | -7.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CACX.L | ^NDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 2.69 | -1.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.87 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.98 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.81 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
CACX.L vs. ^NDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CACX.L drawdown since its inception was -32.83%, smaller than the maximum ^NDX drawdown of -34.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CACX.L and ^NDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CACX.L | ^NDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.83% | -34.63% | +1.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.81% | -12.05% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.77% | -24.98% | +10.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.36% | -28.43% | +9.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.83% | -28.43% | -4.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.61% | -0.53% | -3.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.30% | -5.62% | +0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.89% | 3.98% | -0.09% |
Volatility
CACX.L vs. ^NDX - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor CAC 40 (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (CACX.L) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX) at 3.97%. This indicates that CACX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^NDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CACX.L | ^NDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | 3.97% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.20% | 11.00% | +0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.50% | 15.42% | -0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 21.32% | -4.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.62% | 22.44% | -4.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CACX.L and ^NDX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CACX.L and ^NDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer