CACE.TO vs. XDIV.TO
CACE.TO (Avantis CIBC Canadian Equity ETF) and XDIV.TO (iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CACE.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while XDIV.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index. CACE.TO is actively managed, while XDIV.TO is passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CACE.TO charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for XDIV.TO.
Performance
CACE.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CACE.TO
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 5.11%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDIV.TO
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 3.66%
- YTD
- 20.26%
- 6M
- 19.53%
- 1Y
- 40.50%
- 3Y*
- 23.53%
- 5Y*
- 16.63%
- 10Y*
- —
CACE.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CACE.TO Avantis CIBC Canadian Equity ETF | 5.77% |
XDIV.TO iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF | 14.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between CACE.TO and XDIV.TO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2026 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CACE.TO vs. XDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CACE.TO
XDIV.TO
CACE.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis CIBC Canadian Equity ETF (CACE.TO) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CACE.TO | XDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 5.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.33 | 0.82 | +0.52 |
Drawdowns
CACE.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CACE.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.51%, smaller than the maximum XDIV.TO drawdown of -41.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CACE.TO and XDIV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CACE.TO | XDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.51% | -41.30% | +30.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.82% | -4.25% | +1.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.68% | — |
Volatility
CACE.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CACE.TO | XDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.37% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.37% | 7.89% | +8.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.37% | 10.53% | +5.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.37% | 16.00% | +0.37% |
CACE.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CACE.TO has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than XDIV.TO's 0.11% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CACE.TO vs. XDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison
CACE.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACE.TO Avantis CIBC Canadian Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XDIV.TO iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF | 3.26% | 3.81% | 4.29% | 4.20% | 3.95% | 3.58% | 4.58% | 4.02% | 4.85% | 1.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CACE.TO and XDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for CACE.TO.
CACE.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while XDIV.TO is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for CACE.TO and 0.11% for XDIV.TO.
Find the right allocation for CACE.TO and XDIV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer