PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CACB.TO vs. XCBG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CACB.TO vs. XCBG.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CACB.TO (CIBC Active Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) and XCBG.TO (iShares ESG Advanced Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. CACB.TO is actively managed, while XCBG.TO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CACB.TO returned 6.64%/yr vs 5.93%/yr for XCBG.TO. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CACB.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for XCBG.TO.

Performance

CACB.TO vs. XCBG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CIBC Active Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (CACB.TO) and iShares ESG Advanced Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (XCBG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CACB.TO achieves a 1.98% return, which is significantly higher than XCBG.TO's 1.59% return.

CACB.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
1.83%
YTD
1.98%
6M
1.75%
1Y
4.87%
3Y*
6.64%
5Y*
3.34%
10Y*
—

XCBG.TO

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.47%
YTD
1.59%
6M
1.49%
1Y
3.86%
3Y*
5.93%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CACB.TO vs. XCBG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CACB.TO
CIBC Active Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF		1.98%4.34%7.21%10.68%-8.04%0.41%
XCBG.TO
iShares ESG Advanced Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF		1.59%4.21%6.79%7.45%-7.40%-1.10%

Correlation

The correlation between CACB.TO and XCBG.TO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2021

0.52

The correlation between CACB.TO and XCBG.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

CIBC Active Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF

iShares ESG Advanced Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF

Often compared with CACB.TO:
CACB.TO vs. CAEM.TOCACB.TO vs. XHB.TOCACB.TO vs. VCB.TOCACB.TO vs. CCAD.TOCACB.TO vs. XIGS.TOCACB.TO vs. ZBBB.TOCACB.TO vs. FCSB.NEO
Often compared with XCBG.TO:
XCBG.TO vs. XCB.TOXCBG.TO vs. XHB.TOXCBG.TO vs. ZMMK.TOXCBG.TO vs. XSTH.TOXCBG.TO vs. GEQT.TOXCBG.TO vs. XSHG.TOXCBG.TO vs. ZAG.TO

Return for Risk

CACB.TO vs. XCBG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CACB.TO
CACB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
CACB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CACB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
CACB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
CACB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
CACB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
XCBG.TO
XCBG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
XCBG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCBG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCBG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
XCBG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCBG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CACB.TO vs. XCBG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CIBC Active Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (CACB.TO) and iShares ESG Advanced Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (XCBG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CACB.TOXCBG.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.35
1.31

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.92
1.88

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.25

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

1.91

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.75

5.93

-0.18

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CACB.TO vs. XCBG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CACB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the XCBG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CACB.TO and XCBG.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CACB.TOXCBG.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

1.31

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.53

+0.23

Drawdowns

CACB.TO vs. XCBG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CACB.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.97%, which is greater than XCBG.TO's maximum drawdown of -12.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CACB.TO and XCBG.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

CACB.TOXCBG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.97%

-12.14%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.59%

-2.03%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.15%

-2.26%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.87%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.08%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.52%

-3.53%

+1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

0.65%

+0.20%

Volatility

CACB.TO vs. XCBG.TO - Volatility Comparison

CIBC Active Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (CACB.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.36% compared to iShares ESG Advanced Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (XCBG.TO) at 1.07%. This indicates that CACB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCBG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

CACB.TOXCBG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

1.07%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.79%

2.37%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.64%

2.95%

+0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.66%

4.21%

+1.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.24%

4.21%

+2.03%

CACB.TO vs. XCBG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CACB.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XCBG.TO's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

CACB.TO vs. XCBG.TO - Dividend Comparison

CACB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than XCBG.TO's 3.93% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CACB.TO
CIBC Active Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF		4.40%4.46%4.24%5.48%4.97%4.64%4.58%4.60%
XCBG.TO
iShares ESG Advanced Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF		3.93%3.84%3.61%3.19%2.99%0.87%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

CACB.TO and XCBG.TO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XCBG.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XCBG.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CACB.TO.

They also come from different issuers: CIBC and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for CACB.TO and 0.17% for XCBG.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CACB.TO and XCBG.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer