CABDX vs. NQCRX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CABDX (AB Relative Value Fund) and NQCRX (Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CABDX returned 11.74%/yr vs 14.89%/yr for NQCRX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CABDX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for NQCRX.

Performance

CABDX vs. NQCRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Relative Value Fund (CABDX) and Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CABDX achieves a 12.87% return, which is significantly lower than NQCRX's 18.43% return. Over the past 10 years, CABDX has underperformed NQCRX with an annualized return of 11.74%, while NQCRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.89% annualized return.

CABDX

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 1.96%
• YTD: 12.87%
• 6M: 12.00%
• 1Y: 21.51%
• 3Y*: 15.63%
• 5Y*: 10.04%
• 10Y*: 11.74%

NQCRX

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 2.00%
• YTD: 18.43%
• 6M: 17.80%
• 1Y: 37.43%
• 3Y*: 22.94%
• 5Y*: 15.27%
• 10Y*: 14.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CABDX vs. NQCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CABDX AB Relative Value Fund	12.87%	10.26%	12.63%	11.24%	-4.23%	27.48%	2.81%	23.06%	-6.00%	18.84%
NQCRX Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund	18.43%	22.44%	17.74%	13.76%	-1.07%	25.38%	-0.27%	47.63%	-15.47%	15.46%

Correlation

The correlation between CABDX and NQCRX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2006	0.93

The correlation between CABDX and NQCRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CABDX vs. NQCRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CABDX

CABDX Risk / Return Rank: 69
CABDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
CABDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
CABDX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
CABDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
CABDX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

NQCRX

NQCRX Risk / Return Rank: 92
NQCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
NQCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
NQCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
NQCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
NQCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CABDX vs. NQCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Relative Value Fund (CABDX) and Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CABDX	NQCRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	3.01	-0.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.10	4.13	-1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.52	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.63	6.32	-2.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.19	23.35	-10.17

CABDX vs. NQCRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CABDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the NQCRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CABDX and NQCRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CABDX vs. NQCRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CABDX drawdown since its inception was -57.40%, roughly equal to the maximum NQCRX drawdown of -57.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CABDX and NQCRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CABDX	NQCRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.40%	-57.85%	+0.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.21%	-6.07%	-0.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.69%	-17.21%	+1.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.53%	-17.61%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.33%	-41.84%	+5.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.27%	0.00%	-0.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.43%	-9.99%	+1.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.71%	1.63%	+0.08%

Volatility

CABDX vs. NQCRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB Relative Value Fund (CABDX) is 3.20%, while Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that CABDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NQCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CABDX	NQCRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.20%	4.14%	-0.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.92%	9.92%	-2.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.56%	12.77%	-2.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.43%	15.62%	-1.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.52%	18.94%	-2.42%

CABDX vs. NQCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CABDX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than NQCRX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

CABDX vs. NQCRX - Dividend Comparison

CABDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.36%, less than NQCRX's 6.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CABDX AB Relative Value Fund	5.36%	6.05%	11.24%	6.55%	8.00%	10.15%	1.18%	4.45%	15.34%	12.71%	6.97%	4.34%
NQCRX Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund	6.17%	7.30%	6.82%	2.22%	4.63%	20.85%	17.95%	26.88%	34.12%	27.42%	10.74%	61.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CABDX and NQCRX in my portfolio?

CABDX and NQCRX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CABDX or NQCRX?

NQCRX has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to CABDX (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CABDX dropped -57.40% vs NQCRX's -57.85%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NQCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.