PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAAPX vs. ARGFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAAPX vs. ARGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ariel Appreciation Fund (CAAPX) and Ariel Fund (ARGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAAPX achieves a 12.31% return, which is significantly higher than ARGFX's 8.20% return. Over the past 10 years, CAAPX has underperformed ARGFX with an annualized return of 8.79%, while ARGFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.14% annualized return.


CAAPX

1D
1.05%
1M
4.46%
YTD
12.31%
6M
10.62%
1Y
32.06%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
6.57%
10Y*
8.79%

ARGFX

1D
1.77%
1M
5.18%
YTD
8.20%
6M
6.74%
1Y
30.83%
3Y*
13.37%
5Y*
6.54%
10Y*
10.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAAPX vs. ARGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAAPX
Ariel Appreciation Fund
12.31%11.04%6.07%10.58%-12.27%25.72%7.42%24.58%-13.93%15.24%
ARGFX
Ariel Fund
8.20%14.08%11.56%15.78%-18.68%30.29%10.05%24.64%-13.59%15.99%

Correlation

The correlation between CAAPX and ARGFX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 1989

0.93

The correlation between CAAPX and ARGFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAAPX vs. ARGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAAPX
CAAPX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CAAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
CAAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

ARGFX
ARGFX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
ARGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
ARGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAAPX vs. ARGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ariel Appreciation Fund (CAAPX) and Ariel Fund (ARGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CAAPXARGFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.29

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

2.59

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.75

7.60

+1.15

CAAPX vs. ARGFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAAPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the ARGFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAAPX and ARGFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAAPX vs. ARGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAAPX drawdown since its inception was -61.92%, smaller than the maximum ARGFX drawdown of -71.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAAPX and ARGFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAAPXARGFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.92%

-71.02%

+9.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.70%

-12.36%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.29%

-28.07%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.40%

-33.00%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.58%

-45.29%

+2.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-0.51%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.05%

-8.45%

+0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.79%

4.21%

-0.42%

Volatility

CAAPX vs. ARGFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ariel Appreciation Fund (CAAPX) is 4.41%, while Ariel Fund (ARGFX) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that CAAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAAPXARGFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

5.19%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.81%

13.71%

-0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.09%

19.14%

-1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.27%

22.48%

-0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.19%

22.83%

-0.64%

CAAPX vs. ARGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAAPX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than ARGFX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAAPX vs. ARGFX - Dividend Comparison

CAAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.45%, more than ARGFX's 10.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARGFX
Ariel Fund
10.91%11.80%5.49%5.09%9.01%5.56%5.33%5.81%10.35%6.30%6.56%16.28%
CAAPX
Ariel Appreciation Fund
11.45%12.86%6.11%6.31%10.51%14.21%9.85%7.58%7.37%12.53%7.88%12.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, CAAPX and ARGFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ARGFX has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to CAAPX (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAAPX dropped -61.92% vs ARGFX's -71.02%.

CAAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAAPX and ARGFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer