CAAPX vs. ARGFX
CAAPX (Ariel Appreciation Fund) and ARGFX (Ariel Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds from Ariel Investments. Over the past 10 years, CAAPX returned 8.79%/yr vs 10.14%/yr for ARGFX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CAAPX charges 1.12%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for ARGFX.
Performance
CAAPX vs. ARGFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAAPX achieves a 12.31% return, which is significantly higher than ARGFX's 8.20% return. Over the past 10 years, CAAPX has underperformed ARGFX with an annualized return of 8.79%, while ARGFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.14% annualized return.
CAAPX
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 4.46%
- YTD
- 12.31%
- 6M
- 10.62%
- 1Y
- 32.06%
- 3Y*
- 11.42%
- 5Y*
- 6.57%
- 10Y*
- 8.79%
ARGFX
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 8.20%
- 6M
- 6.74%
- 1Y
- 30.83%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- 6.54%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
CAAPX vs. ARGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAAPX Ariel Appreciation Fund | 12.31% | 11.04% | 6.07% | 10.58% | -12.27% | 25.72% | 7.42% | 24.58% | -13.93% | 15.24% |
ARGFX Ariel Fund | 8.20% | 14.08% | 11.56% | 15.78% | -18.68% | 30.29% | 10.05% | 24.64% | -13.59% | 15.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAAPX and ARGFX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 1989 | 0.93 |
The correlation between CAAPX and ARGFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAAPX vs. ARGFX — Risk / Return Rank
CAAPX
ARGFX
CAAPX vs. ARGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ariel Appreciation Fund (CAAPX) and Ariel Fund (ARGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CAAPX | ARGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.29 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 2.59 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.75 | 7.60 | +1.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CAAPX vs. ARGFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAAPX drawdown since its inception was -61.92%, smaller than the maximum ARGFX drawdown of -71.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAAPX and ARGFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAAPX | ARGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.92% | -71.02% | +9.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.70% | -12.36% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.29% | -28.07% | +0.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.40% | -33.00% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.58% | -45.29% | +2.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -0.51% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.05% | -8.45% | +0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.79% | 4.21% | -0.42% |
Volatility
CAAPX vs. ARGFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ariel Appreciation Fund (CAAPX) is 4.41%, while Ariel Fund (ARGFX) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that CAAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAAPX | ARGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 5.19% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.81% | 13.71% | -0.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.09% | 19.14% | -1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.27% | 22.48% | -0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.19% | 22.83% | -0.64% |
CAAPX vs. ARGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAAPX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than ARGFX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAAPX vs. ARGFX - Dividend Comparison
CAAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.45%, more than ARGFX's 10.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARGFX Ariel Fund | 10.91% | 11.80% | 5.49% | 5.09% | 9.01% | 5.56% | 5.33% | 5.81% | 10.35% | 6.30% | 6.56% | 16.28% |
CAAPX Ariel Appreciation Fund | 11.45% | 12.86% | 6.11% | 6.31% | 10.51% | 14.21% | 9.85% | 7.58% | 7.37% | 12.53% | 7.88% | 12.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, CAAPX and ARGFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ARGFX has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to CAAPX (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAAPX dropped -61.92% vs ARGFX's -71.02%.
CAAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CAAPX and ARGFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer