PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAAA vs. FAAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAAA vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Commercial Mortgage Opportunities ETF (CAAA) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAAA achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 19.14% return.


CAAA

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.55%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.86%
1Y
4.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FAAR

1D
-0.91%
1M
-5.21%
YTD
19.14%
6M
18.06%
1Y
28.33%
3Y*
10.57%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
4.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAAA vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CAAA and FAAR is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2024

-0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAAA vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAAA
CAAA Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
CAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
CAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

FAAR
FAAR Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FAAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAAR Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FAAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAAA vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Commercial Mortgage Opportunities ETF (CAAA) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CAAAFAARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.37

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

4.52

-2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.45

15.18

-8.72

CAAA vs. FAAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAAA Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the FAAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAAA and FAAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAAA vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAAA drawdown since its inception was -2.24%, smaller than the maximum FAAR drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAAA and FAAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAAAFAARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.24%

-18.03%

+15.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.08%

-6.29%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-6.29%

+5.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.56%

-7.82%

+7.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

1.87%

-1.17%

Volatility

CAAA vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Commercial Mortgage Opportunities ETF (CAAA) is 1.01%, while First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) has a volatility of 2.55%. This indicates that CAAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAAAFAARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

2.55%

-1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.25%

9.68%

-7.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10%

13.38%

-10.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.21%

12.96%

-9.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.21%

11.54%

-8.33%

CAAA vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAAA has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAAA vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison

CAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.29%, less than FAAR's 9.66% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAAA
First Trust Commercial Mortgage Opportunities ETF
5.29%6.09%4.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
9.66%11.63%3.45%3.20%5.82%6.49%3.05%1.02%0.58%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAAA and FAAR have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAAR has higher volatility (2.55%) compared to CAAA (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAAA dropped -2.24% vs FAAR's -18.03%.

On 1-year performance, FAAR leads with 28.33% vs 4.50% for CAAA. On fees, CAAA is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, CAAA has been the lower-risk option at 1.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FAAR has performed better with a 28.33% return vs 4.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CAAA is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.

FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.66%, compared with 5.29% for CAAA.

CAAA is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while FAAR is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CAAA and 0.95% for FAAR.

FAAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAAA and FAAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer