C50U.L vs. SX5S.L
C50U.L (Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C)) and SX5S.L (Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, from Amundi and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, C50U.L returned 10.48%/yr vs 10.33%/yr for SX5S.L. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. C50U.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SX5S.L.
Performance
C50U.L vs. SX5S.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
C50U.L is traded in USD, while SX5S.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SX5S.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with C50U.L having a 6.12% return and SX5S.L slightly higher at 6.20%.
C50U.L
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 6.12%
- 6M
- 8.26%
- 1Y
- 17.64%
- 3Y*
- 18.70%
- 5Y*
- 10.48%
- 10Y*
- —
SX5S.L
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 3.96%
- YTD
- 6.20%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- 1Y
- 17.48%
- 3Y*
- 18.49%
- 5Y*
- 10.33%
- 10Y*
- 10.60%
C50U.L vs. SX5S.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C50U.L Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C) | 6.12% | 37.30% | 4.69% | 26.93% | -13.63% | 15.13% |
SX5S.L Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF | 6.20% | 37.31% | 4.37% | 26.24% | -13.76% | 15.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between C50U.L and SX5S.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2021 | 0.93 |
The correlation between C50U.L and SX5S.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
C50U.L vs. SX5S.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
C50U.L
SX5S.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
-
Financial Services
C50U.L
SX5S.L
Industrials
C50U.L
SX5S.L
Technology
C50U.L
SX5S.L
Consumer Cyclical
C50U.L
SX5S.L
Healthcare
C50U.L
SX5S.L
Energy
C50U.L
SX5S.L
Utilities
C50U.L
SX5S.L
Consumer Defensive
C50U.L
SX5S.L
Communication Services
C50U.L
SX5S.L
Basic Materials
C50U.L
SX5S.L
Real Estate
C50U.L
-
SX5S.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
C50U.L vs. SX5S.L — Risk / Return Rank
C50U.L
SX5S.L
C50U.L vs. SX5S.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (C50U.L) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SX5S.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| C50U.L | SX5S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.19 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 1.32 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.57 | 4.48 | +0.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| C50U.L | SX5S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 1.02 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.52 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.42 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
C50U.L vs. SX5S.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum C50U.L drawdown since its inception was -34.81%, smaller than the maximum SX5S.L drawdown of -39.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C50U.L and SX5S.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| C50U.L | SX5S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.81% | -39.20% | +4.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.07% | -13.21% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.61% | -15.38% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.81% | -35.24% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -1.32% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.56% | -7.99% | +1.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.85% | 3.89% | -0.04% |
Volatility
C50U.L vs. SX5S.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (C50U.L) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SX5S.L) at 5.61%. This indicates that C50U.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SX5S.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| C50U.L | SX5S.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.92% | 5.61% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.69% | 13.94% | +0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.86% | 17.14% | +0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.94% | 21.03% | -0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 22.77% | -2.15% |
C50U.L vs. SX5S.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
C50U.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SX5S.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
C50U.L vs. SX5S.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither C50U.L nor SX5S.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, C50U.L and SX5S.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SX5S.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SX5S.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for C50U.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for C50U.L and 0.05% for SX5S.L.
Find the right allocation for C50U.L and SX5S.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer