C50U.L vs. IEFV.L
C50U.L (Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C)) and IEFV.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - C50U.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while IEFV.L tracks the MSCI Europe Value NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, C50U.L returned 10.89%/yr vs 13.89%/yr for IEFV.L. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. C50U.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IEFV.L.
Performance
C50U.L vs. IEFV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
C50U.L is traded in USD, while IEFV.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IEFV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, C50U.L achieves a 7.06% return, which is significantly lower than IEFV.L's 12.41% return.
C50U.L
- 1D
- 1.07%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 7.06%
- 6M
- 7.20%
- 1Y
- 19.97%
- 3Y*
- 18.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.89%
- 10Y*
- —
IEFV.L
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- 12.41%
- 6M
- 12.75%
- 1Y
- 34.01%
- 3Y*
- 24.32%
- 5Y*
- 13.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.57%
C50U.L vs. IEFV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C50U.L Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C) | 7.06% | 37.30% | 4.69% | 26.93% | -13.63% | 15.13% |
IEFV.L iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF | 12.41% | 52.94% | 3.64% | 17.29% | -9.38% | 18.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between C50U.L and IEFV.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2021 | 0.87 |
The correlation between C50U.L and IEFV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
C50U.L vs. IEFV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
C50U.L
IEFV.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
C50U.L
IEFV.L
Industrials
C50U.L
IEFV.L
Technology
C50U.L
IEFV.L
Consumer Cyclical
C50U.L
IEFV.L
Healthcare
C50U.L
IEFV.L
Energy
C50U.L
IEFV.L
Utilities
C50U.L
IEFV.L
Consumer Defensive
C50U.L
IEFV.L
Communication Services
C50U.L
IEFV.L
Basic Materials
C50U.L
IEFV.L
Real Estate
C50U.L
-
IEFV.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
C50U.L vs. IEFV.L — Risk / Return Rank
C50U.L
IEFV.L
C50U.L vs. IEFV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (C50U.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| C50U.L | IEFV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.38 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 2.90 | -1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.17 | 10.29 | -5.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
C50U.L vs. IEFV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum C50U.L drawdown since its inception was -34.81%, smaller than the maximum IEFV.L drawdown of -46.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C50U.L and IEFV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| C50U.L | IEFV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.81% | -46.19% | +11.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.07% | -11.66% | -1.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.61% | -16.49% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.81% | -31.46% | -3.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.21% | -1.08% | -1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -10.02% | +3.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.85% | 3.30% | +0.55% |
Volatility
C50U.L vs. IEFV.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (C50U.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (IEFV.L) have volatilities of 4.37% and 4.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| C50U.L | IEFV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 4.48% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.96% | 12.87% | +2.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.82% | 15.62% | +2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.95% | 20.15% | +0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.57% | 19.96% | +0.61% |
C50U.L vs. IEFV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
C50U.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IEFV.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
C50U.L vs. IEFV.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither C50U.L nor IEFV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
C50U.L and IEFV.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, C50U.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
C50U.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IEFV.L.
C50U.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while IEFV.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for C50U.L and 0.25% for IEFV.L.
Find the right allocation for C50U.L and IEFV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer