C50U.L vs. CSSX5E.MI
C50U.L (Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C)) and CSSX5E.MI (iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc) are both Europe Equities funds - C50U.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while CSSX5E.MI tracks the EURO STOXX® 50. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, C50U.L returned 10.48%/yr vs 10.48%/yr for CSSX5E.MI. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. C50U.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CSSX5E.MI.
Performance
C50U.L vs. CSSX5E.MI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
C50U.L is traded in USD, while CSSX5E.MI is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CSSX5E.MI values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, C50U.L achieves a 6.12% return, which is significantly higher than CSSX5E.MI's 5.78% return.
C50U.L
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 6.12%
- 6M
- 8.26%
- 1Y
- 17.64%
- 3Y*
- 18.70%
- 5Y*
- 10.48%
- 10Y*
- —
CSSX5E.MI
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- 5.78%
- 6M
- 8.36%
- 1Y
- 17.78%
- 3Y*
- 18.77%
- 5Y*
- 10.48%
- 10Y*
- 10.73%
C50U.L vs. CSSX5E.MI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C50U.L Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C) | 6.12% | 37.30% | 4.69% | 26.93% | -13.63% | 15.13% |
CSSX5E.MI iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc | 5.78% | 38.91% | 4.59% | 26.66% | -14.22% | 15.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between C50U.L and CSSX5E.MI is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2021 | 0.94 |
The correlation between C50U.L and CSSX5E.MI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
C50U.L vs. CSSX5E.MI — Risk / Return Rank
C50U.L
CSSX5E.MI
C50U.L vs. CSSX5E.MI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (C50U.L) and iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CSSX5E.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| C50U.L | CSSX5E.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.19 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | 1.36 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.57 | 4.58 | -0.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| C50U.L | CSSX5E.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | 1.01 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.32 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
C50U.L vs. CSSX5E.MI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum C50U.L drawdown since its inception was -34.81%, smaller than the maximum CSSX5E.MI drawdown of -39.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C50U.L and CSSX5E.MI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| C50U.L | CSSX5E.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.81% | -39.19% | +4.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.07% | -13.04% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.61% | -15.57% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.81% | -35.00% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -1.13% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.56% | -10.67% | +4.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.85% | 3.88% | -0.03% |
Volatility
C50U.L vs. CSSX5E.MI - Volatility Comparison
Amundi EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (C50U.L) has a higher volatility of 5.92% compared to iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 ETF EUR Acc (CSSX5E.MI) at 5.44%. This indicates that C50U.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSSX5E.MI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| C50U.L | CSSX5E.MI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.92% | 5.44% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.69% | 14.58% | +0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.86% | 17.61% | +0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.94% | 20.73% | +0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 20.55% | +0.07% |
C50U.L vs. CSSX5E.MI - Expense Ratio Comparison
C50U.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than CSSX5E.MI's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
C50U.L vs. CSSX5E.MI - Dividend Comparison
Neither C50U.L nor CSSX5E.MI has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, C50U.L and CSSX5E.MI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, CSSX5E.MI is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSSX5E.MI is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for C50U.L.
C50U.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while CSSX5E.MI tracks EURO STOXX® 50. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for C50U.L and 0.10% for CSSX5E.MI.
Find the right allocation for C50U.L and CSSX5E.MI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer