C099.DE vs. BCFU.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

C099.DE (Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) and BCFU.DE (UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both Commodities funds - C099.DE tracks the Bloomberg Energy and Metals Equal-Weighted (EUR Hedged) while BCFU.DE tracks the UBS BCOM Constant Maturity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, C099.DE returned 21.14%/yr vs 11.53%/yr for BCFU.DE. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. C099.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for BCFU.DE.

Performance

C099.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (C099.DE) and UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

C099.DE is traded in EUR, while BCFU.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BCFU.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, C099.DE achieves a 28.92% return, which is significantly higher than BCFU.DE's 19.04% return.

C099.DE

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -1.58%
• YTD: 28.92%
• 6M: 38.05%
• 1Y: 63.83%
• 3Y*: 21.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCFU.DE

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: -1.37%
• YTD: 19.04%
• 6M: 20.49%
• 1Y: 30.38%
• 3Y*: 11.53%
• 5Y*: 13.04%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

C099.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
C099.DE Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc	28.92%	29.62%	4.85%	-8.37%
BCFU.DE UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	19.04%	5.83%	11.25%	-7.10%

Correlation

The correlation between C099.DE and BCFU.DE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2023	0.72

The correlation between C099.DE and BCFU.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

C099.DE vs. BCFU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

C099.DE

C099.DE Risk / Return Rank: 85
C099.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
C099.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
C099.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 84
C099.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
C099.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 86

BCFU.DE

BCFU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 74
BCFU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
BCFU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
BCFU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 73
BCFU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
BCFU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

C099.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (C099.DE) and UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	C099.DE	BCFU.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.92	1.98	+0.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.47	2.58	+0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.35	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.06	4.30	+0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.91	9.99	+7.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

C099.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current C099.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is higher than the BCFU.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of C099.DE and BCFU.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	C099.DE	BCFU.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.92	1.98	+0.94
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.76	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	0.62	+0.23

Drawdowns

C099.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum C099.DE drawdown since its inception was -15.35%, smaller than the maximum BCFU.DE drawdown of -25.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C099.DE and BCFU.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	C099.DE	BCFU.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.35%	-25.15%	+9.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.55%	-7.03%	-5.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.35%	-13.93%	-1.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.74%	-3.51%	-1.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.21%	-11.04%	+4.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.55%	3.03%	+0.52%

Volatility

C099.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (C099.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.09% compared to UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE) at 4.47%. This indicates that C099.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCFU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	C099.DE	BCFU.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.09%	4.47%	+0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.66%	12.82%	+6.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.77%	15.29%	+6.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.90%	16.95%	+0.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.90%	15.33%	+2.57%

C099.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

C099.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BCFU.DE's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

C099.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither C099.DE nor BCFU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both C099.DE and BCFU.DE in my portfolio?

C099.DE and BCFU.DE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, C099.DE or BCFU.DE?

On fees, BCFU.DE is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, C099.DE or BCFU.DE?

BCFU.DE is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for C099.DE.

What is the main difference between C099.DE and BCFU.DE?

C099.DE tracks Bloomberg Energy and Metals Equal-Weighted (EUR Hedged), while BCFU.DE tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for C099.DE and 0.34% for BCFU.DE.