C024.DE vs. PHSP.L
C024.DE (Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist) and PHSP.L (WisdomTree Physical Silver) are both exchange-traded funds - C024.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A, while PHSP.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, C024.DE returned 6.36%/yr vs 9.94%/yr for PHSP.L. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. C024.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for PHSP.L.
Performance
C024.DE vs. PHSP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
C024.DE is traded in EUR, while PHSP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PHSP.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, C024.DE achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly higher than PHSP.L's -19.97% return. Over the past 10 years, C024.DE has underperformed PHSP.L with an annualized return of 6.36%, while PHSP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.94% annualized return.
C024.DE
- 1D
- -3.37%
- 1M
- -8.00%
- 6M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- 6.31%
- 1Y
- 27.95%
- 3Y*
- 11.58%
- 5Y*
- 0.96%
- 10Y*
- 6.36%
PHSP.L
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -19.77%
- 6M
- -36.21%
- YTD
- -19.97%
- 1Y
- 48.42%
- 3Y*
- 29.27%
- 5Y*
- 17.01%
- 10Y*
- 9.94%
C024.DE vs. PHSP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C024.DE Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist | 6.31% | 14.97% | 22.87% | -17.78% | -16.16% | 3.42% | 21.54% | 40.72% | -22.27% | 23.87% |
PHSP.L WisdomTree Physical Silver | -19.97% | 117.70% | 28.78% | -4.53% | 9.55% | -6.39% | 33.20% | 19.73% | -4.74% | -9.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between C024.DE and PHSP.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2013 | 0.13 |
Over the past year, C024.DE and PHSP.L have become more correlated (0.36) than their long-term average of 0.13, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
C024.DE vs. PHSP.L — Risk / Return Rank
C024.DE
PHSP.L
C024.DE vs. PHSP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE) and WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| C024.DE | PHSP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.19 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 0.99 | +1.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.41 | 2.06 | +8.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
C024.DE vs. PHSP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum C024.DE drawdown since its inception was -49.68%, smaller than the maximum PHSP.L drawdown of -71.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C024.DE and PHSP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| C024.DE | PHSP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.68% | -71.39% | +21.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.60% | -48.90% | +38.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.82% | -48.90% | +23.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.34% | -48.90% | +9.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.10% | -48.90% | +1.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.23% | -48.90% | +35.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.23% | -42.76% | +16.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 23.42% | -20.70% |
Volatility
C024.DE vs. PHSP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE) is 9.58%, while WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L) has a volatility of 12.56%. This indicates that C024.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHSP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| C024.DE | PHSP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.58% | 12.56% | -2.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.53% | 50.54% | -36.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.31% | 56.40% | -38.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.98% | 37.09% | -14.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.16% | 31.14% | -6.98% |
C024.DE vs. PHSP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
C024.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than PHSP.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
C024.DE vs. PHSP.L - Dividend Comparison
C024.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, while PHSP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C024.DE Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist | 1.78% | 1.89% | 2.19% | 1.98% | 1.34% | 1.22% | 1.42% | 1.88% | 2.49% |
PHSP.L WisdomTree Physical Silver | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
C024.DE and PHSP.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, C024.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
C024.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for PHSP.L.
C024.DE is categorized as China Equities, while PHSP.L is Silver. C024.DE tracks MSCI China A, while PHSP.L tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for C024.DE and 0.49% for PHSP.L.
Find the right allocation for C024.DE and PHSP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer