C024.DE vs. M9SV.DE
C024.DE (Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist) and M9SV.DE (Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR) are both China Equities funds - C024.DE tracks the MSCI China A while M9SV.DE tracks the STOXX China A 900 Minimum Variance Unconstrained AM Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, C024.DE returned 2.13%/yr vs 4.55%/yr for M9SV.DE. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. C024.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for M9SV.DE.
Performance
C024.DE vs. M9SV.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, C024.DE achieves a 12.63% return, which is significantly higher than M9SV.DE's -4.50% return.
C024.DE
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- 6M
- 8.61%
- YTD
- 12.63%
- 1Y
- 37.40%
- 3Y*
- 13.00%
- 5Y*
- 2.13%
- 10Y*
- 6.89%
M9SV.DE
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -4.54%
- 6M
- -6.05%
- YTD
- -4.50%
- 1Y
- 0.43%
- 3Y*
- 6.93%
- 5Y*
- 4.55%
- 10Y*
- —
C024.DE vs. M9SV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C024.DE Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist | 12.63% | 14.97% | 22.87% | -17.78% | -16.16% | 3.42% | 21.54% | 40.72% | -21.83% |
M9SV.DE Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR | -4.50% | -5.32% | 37.47% | 2.90% | -11.14% | 18.00% | 14.68% | 7.74% | -16.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between C024.DE and M9SV.DE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 7, 2018 | 0.58 |
The correlation between C024.DE and M9SV.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
C024.DE vs. M9SV.DE — Risk / Return Rank
C024.DE
M9SV.DE
C024.DE vs. M9SV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE) and Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR (M9SV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| C024.DE | M9SV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.03 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.17 | 0.18 | +5.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.40 | 0.41 | +13.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
C024.DE vs. M9SV.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum C024.DE drawdown since its inception was -49.68%, which is greater than M9SV.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C024.DE and M9SV.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| C024.DE | M9SV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.68% | -23.79% | -25.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.20% | -7.48% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.82% | -23.79% | -2.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.34% | -23.79% | -15.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.08% | -17.81% | +9.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.24% | -9.52% | -16.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 3.21% | -0.62% |
Volatility
C024.DE vs. M9SV.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.89% compared to Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR (M9SV.DE) at 3.73%. This indicates that C024.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than M9SV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| C024.DE | M9SV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.89% | 3.73% | +5.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.94% | 7.51% | +6.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.82% | 11.20% | +6.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.93% | 20.43% | +2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.13% | 21.49% | +2.64% |
C024.DE vs. M9SV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
C024.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than M9SV.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
C024.DE vs. M9SV.DE - Dividend Comparison
C024.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, while M9SV.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C024.DE Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist | 1.68% | 1.89% | 2.19% | 1.98% | 1.34% | 1.22% | 1.42% | 1.88% | 2.49% |
M9SV.DE Market Access STOXX China A Minimum Variance Index UCITS ETF C EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
C024.DE and M9SV.DE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, C024.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
C024.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for M9SV.DE.
C024.DE tracks MSCI China A, while M9SV.DE tracks STOXX China A 900 Minimum Variance Unconstrained AM Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Market Access. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for C024.DE and 0.45% for M9SV.DE.
Find the right allocation for C024.DE and M9SV.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer