PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
C024.DE vs. LYP6.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

C024.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE) and Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc (LYP6.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, C024.DE achieves a 12.05% return, which is significantly higher than LYP6.DE's 7.48% return.


C024.DE

1D
-0.65%
1M
2.07%
YTD
12.05%
6M
16.25%
1Y
40.47%
3Y*
12.08%
5Y*
0.57%
10Y*
7.12%

LYP6.DE

1D
0.57%
1M
3.11%
YTD
7.48%
6M
10.06%
1Y
16.54%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
9.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

C024.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
C024.DE
Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist
12.05%14.97%22.87%-17.78%-16.12%3.37%21.54%40.72%-22.27%11.68%
LYP6.DE
Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc
7.48%20.82%8.25%15.97%-10.40%24.81%-1.72%28.59%-11.28%2.60%

Correlation

The correlation between C024.DE and LYP6.DE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2017

0.33

The correlation between C024.DE and LYP6.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (3 years) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

C024.DE vs. LYP6.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

C024.DE
C024.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
C024.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
C024.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
C024.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
C024.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
C024.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

LYP6.DE
LYP6.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
LYP6.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYP6.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYP6.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
LYP6.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYP6.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

C024.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE) and Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc (LYP6.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


C024.DELYP6.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.24

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.94

1.74

+4.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.19

6.63

+11.56

C024.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current C024.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the LYP6.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of C024.DE and LYP6.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


C024.DELYP6.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

1.28

+1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.67

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.56

-0.26

Drawdowns

C024.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum C024.DE drawdown since its inception was -49.68%, which is greater than LYP6.DE's maximum drawdown of -35.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C024.DE and LYP6.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


C024.DELYP6.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.68%

-35.51%

-14.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.78%

-9.45%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.82%

-16.26%

-9.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.47%

-20.71%

-19.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.55%

-1.62%

-6.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.80%

-4.84%

-19.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

2.49%

-0.27%

Volatility

C024.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.71% compared to Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc (LYP6.DE) at 4.35%. This indicates that C024.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYP6.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


C024.DELYP6.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.71%

4.35%

+1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.25%

10.65%

+0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.47%

12.90%

+2.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.92%

14.41%

+8.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.34%

15.86%

+8.48%

C024.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

C024.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than LYP6.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

C024.DE vs. LYP6.DE - Dividend Comparison

C024.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, while LYP6.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
C024.DE
Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist
1.69%1.89%2.19%1.98%1.34%1.23%1.42%1.88%2.49%
LYP6.DE
Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


C024.DE and LYP6.DE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LYP6.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYP6.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for C024.DE.

C024.DE is categorized as China Equities, while LYP6.DE is Europe Equities. C024.DE tracks MSCI China A, while LYP6.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for C024.DE and 0.07% for LYP6.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for C024.DE and LYP6.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer