C024.DE vs. ISP6.L
C024.DE (Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist) and ISP6.L (iShares S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - C024.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A, while ISP6.L is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, C024.DE returned 6.36%/yr vs 9.79%/yr for ISP6.L. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. C024.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for ISP6.L.
Performance
C024.DE vs. ISP6.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
C024.DE is traded in EUR, while ISP6.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ISP6.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, C024.DE achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly lower than ISP6.L's 22.68% return. Over the past 10 years, C024.DE has underperformed ISP6.L with an annualized return of 6.36%, while ISP6.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.79% annualized return.
C024.DE
- 1D
- -3.37%
- 1M
- -8.00%
- 6M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- 6.31%
- 1Y
- 27.95%
- 3Y*
- 11.58%
- 5Y*
- 0.96%
- 10Y*
- 6.36%
ISP6.L
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- 6M
- 15.15%
- YTD
- 22.68%
- 1Y
- 31.69%
- 3Y*
- 12.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.94%
- 10Y*
- 9.79%
C024.DE vs. ISP6.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C024.DE Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist | 6.31% | 14.97% | 22.87% | -17.78% | -16.16% | 3.42% | 21.54% | 40.72% | -22.27% | 23.87% |
ISP6.L iShares S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF | 22.68% | -6.07% | 14.01% | 13.33% | -11.53% | 36.18% | 1.06% | 24.98% | -5.73% | -1.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between C024.DE and ISP6.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2013 | 0.29 |
The correlation between C024.DE and ISP6.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (3 years) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
C024.DE vs. ISP6.L — Risk / Return Rank
C024.DE
ISP6.L
C024.DE vs. ISP6.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE) and iShares S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF (ISP6.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| C024.DE | ISP6.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.36 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 5.15 | -2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.41 | 14.60 | -4.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
C024.DE vs. ISP6.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum C024.DE drawdown since its inception was -49.68%, smaller than the maximum ISP6.L drawdown of -70.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C024.DE and ISP6.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| C024.DE | ISP6.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.68% | -70.50% | +20.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.60% | -6.12% | -4.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.82% | -32.44% | +6.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.34% | -32.44% | -6.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.10% | -41.30% | -5.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.23% | -2.65% | -10.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.23% | -17.36% | -8.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 2.17% | +0.55% |
Volatility
C024.DE vs. ISP6.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.58% compared to iShares S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF (ISP6.L) at 4.51%. This indicates that C024.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISP6.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| C024.DE | ISP6.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.58% | 4.51% | +5.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.53% | 10.90% | +3.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.31% | 15.83% | +2.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.98% | 19.92% | +3.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.16% | 21.25% | +2.91% |
C024.DE vs. ISP6.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
C024.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ISP6.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
C024.DE vs. ISP6.L - Dividend Comparison
C024.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, more than ISP6.L's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C024.DE Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist | 1.78% | 1.89% | 2.19% | 1.98% | 1.34% | 1.22% | 1.42% | 1.88% | 2.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISP6.L iShares S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF | 0.53% | 1.22% | 1.15% | 1.08% | 1.00% | 0.65% | 0.94% | 0.97% | 0.96% | 0.78% | 0.77% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
C024.DE and ISP6.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, C024.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
C024.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ISP6.L.
C024.DE is categorized as China Equities, while ISP6.L is Small Cap Blend Equities. C024.DE tracks MSCI China A, while ISP6.L tracks Russell 2000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for C024.DE and 0.40% for ISP6.L.
Find the right allocation for C024.DE and ISP6.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer