PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
C007.DE vs. DBXI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

C007.DE vs. DBXI.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

C007.DE (Amundi MDAX ESG UCITS ETF Dist) and DBXI.DE (Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - C007.DE tracks the MDAX® ESG+ while DBXI.DE tracks the FTSE MIB. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, C007.DE returned 4.38%/yr vs 14.91%/yr for DBXI.DE. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.30% expense ratio.

Performance

C007.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MDAX ESG UCITS ETF Dist (C007.DE) and Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (DBXI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, C007.DE achieves a 7.27% return, which is significantly lower than DBXI.DE's 14.49% return. Over the past 10 years, C007.DE has underperformed DBXI.DE with an annualized return of 4.38%, while DBXI.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 14.91% annualized return.

C007.DE

1D
0.48%
1M
0.80%
YTD
7.27%
6M
8.93%
1Y
8.46%
3Y*
5.69%
5Y*
-0.66%
10Y*
4.38%

DBXI.DE

1D
0.21%
1M
2.55%
YTD
14.49%
6M
18.42%
1Y
29.63%
3Y*
28.95%
5Y*
19.73%
10Y*
14.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

C007.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
C007.DE
Amundi MDAX ESG UCITS ETF Dist		7.27%17.62%-6.09%8.74%-28.15%13.79%8.23%30.77%-18.28%17.54%
DBXI.DE
Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF		14.49%37.50%18.27%33.40%-9.08%26.51%-4.28%33.02%-14.48%16.46%

Correlation

The correlation between C007.DE and DBXI.DE is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2014

0.69

The correlation between C007.DE and DBXI.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amundi MDAX ESG UCITS ETF Dist

Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF

Often compared with C007.DE:
C007.DE vs. DEAM.DEC007.DE vs. ETDD.DEC007.DE vs. DAXC007.DE vs. AMES.DEC007.DE vs. LYMS.DEC007.DE vs. 18MK.DEC007.DE vs. ELFC.DE
Often compared with DBXI.DE:
DBXI.DE vs. ENEL.MIDBXI.DE vs. CEMR.DEDBXI.DE vs. SRG.MIDBXI.DE vs. ARZGYDBXI.DE vs. SNADBXI.DE vs. ^GSPCDBXI.DE vs. SPY

Return for Risk

C007.DE vs. DBXI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
C007.DE
C007.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
C007.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
C007.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
C007.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
C007.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
C007.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
DBXI.DE
DBXI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DBXI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBXI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBXI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
DBXI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBXI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

C007.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MDAX ESG UCITS ETF Dist (C007.DE) and Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (DBXI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

C007.DEDBXI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.43
1.94

-1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.76
2.70

-1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.34

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

3.17

-2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.72

11.42

-9.70

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

C007.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current C007.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the DBXI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of C007.DE and DBXI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

C007.DEDBXI.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

1.94

-1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

1.09

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.75

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.19

+0.10

Drawdowns

C007.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum C007.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.51%, smaller than the maximum DBXI.DE drawdown of -69.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C007.DE and DBXI.DE.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

C007.DEDBXI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.51%

-69.49%

+29.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.84%

-9.62%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.64%

-17.56%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.33%

-25.10%

-14.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.51%

-40.46%

+0.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.11%

-0.77%

-9.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.88%

-29.56%

+17.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.67%

2.67%

+2.00%

Volatility

C007.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MDAX ESG UCITS ETF Dist (C007.DE) and Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (DBXI.DE) have volatilities of 4.72% and 4.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

C007.DEDBXI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

4.63%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.96%

12.34%

+2.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.70%

15.69%

+3.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.41%

18.31%

+1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.56%

20.37%

-1.81%

C007.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both C007.DE and DBXI.DE have an expense ratio of 0.30%.

Dividends

C007.DE vs. DBXI.DE - Dividend Comparison

C007.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than DBXI.DE's 3.63% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
C007.DE
Amundi MDAX ESG UCITS ETF Dist		1.58%1.70%1.69%1.86%1.76%0.60%0.79%1.57%2.31%2.13%0.00%0.00%
DBXI.DE
Xtrackers FTSE MIB UCITS ETF		3.63%3.93%4.53%3.78%7.45%0.94%4.23%3.33%2.66%1.94%2.51%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

C007.DE and DBXI.DE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

C007.DE and DBXI.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.

C007.DE tracks MDAX® ESG+, while DBXI.DE tracks FTSE MIB. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for C007.DE and DBXI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer